From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: add an 'ana_groups_only' module option
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:52:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56fb153a-ba0e-605b-e774-885c259965a6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209080747.GA9851@lst.de>
On 2/9/22 03:07, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:00:05AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On large installations the ANA log buffer can be exceedingly large;
>> we've come across a controller with 49 ANA Group Descriptors and
>> 65536 namespaces, resulting in an ANA buffer with an order-7 allocation.
>> And this is just to validate that the namespace ID is _really_listed
>> in the log page.
>> So to avoid an overly large memory allocation we can leverage the
>> 'RGO' bit when retrieving the ANA log page, and check whether the
>> ANA group ID from the namespace is found in the ANA descriptors.
>> That cuts down the memory allocation, and provides the same result.
>> But to be on the safe side I've added a module option 'ana_groups_only'
>> to switch between modes.
>
> How is this supposed to work? We'll fail to see what namespaces
> the change applies to.
>
> So in doubt fix the controller config to be less broken (and say hello
> to NetApp and explain them they do not need more namespace for more
> performance), and if that fails switch to a vmalloc allocation for
> the buffer.
I agree with Christoph. I don't see the point in supporting 65536 namespaces across 49 ana groups or controllers. The problem
here is: the vendor is trying to turn NVMe into SCSI.
Moreover, I don't understand how implementing this as a MODULE_PARM is supposed to work. If you configure this module parameter
on it assumes all NVMe-oF arrays connected to the host support RGO. What's really needed here is some kind of protocol mechanism
that will allow the host to dynamically discovery if RGO is supported on a controller by controller basis.
And this isn't an NetApp array. Just look at who's asking for this change if you want a clue as to what NVMe-oF array is asking
for this. I know for a fact this isn't a NetApp array.
/John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 10:00 [PATCH] nvme-multipath: add an 'ana_groups_only' module option Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-07 12:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-02-07 13:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-09 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-09 8:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-09 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-10 2:52 ` John Meneghini [this message]
2022-02-10 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-10 8:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56fb153a-ba0e-605b-e774-885c259965a6@redhat.com \
--to=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox