Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C
@ 2026-03-09  4:27 alistair23
  2026-03-09 11:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
  2026-03-09 15:01 ` Keith Busch
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: alistair23 @ 2026-03-09  4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hare, kbusch, axboe, hch, sagi, linux-nvme, linux-kernel
  Cc: alistair23, Alistair Francis, Kamaljit Singh

From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Section 8.3.4.5.2 of the NVMe 2.1 base spec states that

"""
The 00h identifier shall not be proposed in an AUTH_Negotiate message
that requests secure channel concatenation (i.e., with the SC_C field
set to a non-zero value).
"""

We need to ensure that we don't set the NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL idlist if
SC_C is set.

Signed-off-by: Kamaljit Singh <kamaljit.singh@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
---
v2:
 - Use a macro for Diffie-Hellman Group Identifier List Offset
 - Use a pointer for data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist

 drivers/nvme/host/auth.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/nvme.h     |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
index 405e7c03b1cf..4e8e4ddd6c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ static int nvme_auth_set_dhchap_negotiate_data(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
 {
 	struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_negotiate_data *data = chap->buf;
 	size_t size = sizeof(*data) + sizeof(union nvmf_auth_protocol);
+	u8 dh_list_offset = DH_GID_LIST_OFFSET;
+	u8 *idlist = data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist;
 
 	if (size > CHAP_BUF_SIZE) {
 		chap->status = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_FAILURE_INCORRECT_PAYLOAD;
@@ -144,16 +146,17 @@ static int nvme_auth_set_dhchap_negotiate_data(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
 	data->napd = 1;
 	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.authid = NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_AUTH_ID;
 	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.halen = 3;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.dhlen = 6;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[0] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA256;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[1] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA384;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[2] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA512;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[30] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[31] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_2048;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[32] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_3072;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[33] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_4096;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[34] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_6144;
-	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[35] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_8192;
+	idlist[0] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA256;
+	idlist[1] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA384;
+	idlist[2] = NVME_AUTH_HASH_SHA512;
+	if (chap->sc_c == NVME_AUTH_SECP_NOSC)
+		idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL;
+	idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_2048;
+	idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_3072;
+	idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_4096;
+	idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_6144;
+	idlist[dh_list_offset++] = NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_8192;
+	data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.dhlen = dh_list_offset - DH_GID_LIST_OFFSET;
 
 	chap->sc_c = data->sc_c;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/nvme.h b/include/linux/nvme.h
index 655d194f8e72..bd540ef33b63 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvme.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvme.h
@@ -2332,4 +2332,6 @@ enum nvme_pr_change_ptpl {
 
 #define NVME_PR_IGNORE_KEY (1 << 3)
 
+#define DH_GID_LIST_OFFSET 30
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_NVME_H */
-- 
2.53.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C
  2026-03-09  4:27 [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C alistair23
@ 2026-03-09 11:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
  2026-03-09 15:01 ` Keith Busch
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2026-03-09 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alistair23, kbusch, axboe, hch, sagi, linux-nvme, linux-kernel
  Cc: Alistair Francis, Kamaljit Singh

On 3/9/26 05:27, alistair23@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> 
> Section 8.3.4.5.2 of the NVMe 2.1 base spec states that
> 
> """
> The 00h identifier shall not be proposed in an AUTH_Negotiate message
> that requests secure channel concatenation (i.e., with the SC_C field
> set to a non-zero value).
> """
> 
> We need to ensure that we don't set the NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL idlist if
> SC_C is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamaljit Singh <kamaljit.singh@opensource.wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   - Use a macro for Diffie-Hellman Group Identifier List Offset
>   - Use a pointer for data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist
> 
>   drivers/nvme/host/auth.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>   include/linux/nvme.h     |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C
  2026-03-09  4:27 [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C alistair23
  2026-03-09 11:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
@ 2026-03-09 15:01 ` Keith Busch
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2026-03-09 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alistair23
  Cc: hare, axboe, hch, sagi, linux-nvme, linux-kernel,
	Alistair Francis, Kamaljit Singh

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:27:33PM +1000, alistair23@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> 
> Section 8.3.4.5.2 of the NVMe 2.1 base spec states that
> 
> """
> The 00h identifier shall not be proposed in an AUTH_Negotiate message
> that requests secure channel concatenation (i.e., with the SC_C field
> set to a non-zero value).
> """
> 
> We need to ensure that we don't set the NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL idlist if
> SC_C is set.

Thanks, applied.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-09 15:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-09  4:27 [PATCH v2] nvme-auth: Don't propose NVME_AUTH_DHGROUP_NULL with SC_C alistair23
2026-03-09 11:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-09 15:01 ` Keith Busch

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox