Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] nvme/063 failure (tcp transport)
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 13:25:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <635f3315-a77b-4e8b-8454-20cb7c9ae2e8@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72a394aa-9ed1-45ec-8aaf-5f5ccf1c18ab@grimberg.me>

On 5/18/25 12:01, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/05/2025 15:31, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Using the kernel v6.15-rc6 and the latest blktests (git hash 
>> 613b8377e4d3), I
>> observe the test case nvme/063 fails with tcp transport. Kernel 
>> reported WARN in
>> blk_mq_unquiesce_queue and KASAN sauf in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter 
>> [1]. The
>> failure is recreated in stable manner on my test nodes.
>>
>> The test case script had a bug then this failure was not found until 
>> the bug get
>> fixed. I tried the kernel v6.15-rc1, and observed the same failure 
>> symptom. This
>> test case cannot be run with the kernel v6.14, since it does not have 
>> secure
>> concatenation feature.
>>
>> Actions for fix will be appreciated.
> 
> Hannes, did you encounter this?
> 
No; I would think it's an artifact due to multipath not being enabled.
Shin'ichiro, can you reproduce it with CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH on?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-18 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16 12:31 [bug report] nvme/063 failure (tcp transport) Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-05-18 10:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-18 11:25   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-05-19  2:53     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-05-20 11:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-21 11:51         ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-06-02  2:14           ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-06-02  6:38             ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-19  6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=635f3315-a77b-4e8b-8454-20cb7c9ae2e8@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox