From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu>
To: <alistair23@gmail.com>, <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
<hare@kernel.org>, <kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kbusch@kernel.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>, <hch@lst.de>,
<sagi@grimberg.me>, <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] nvmet-tcp: Support KeyUpdate
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:19:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCKWAZAH7QNO.3739YP7O69XKZ@bsdbackstore.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905024659.811386-8-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 4:46 AM CEST, alistair23 wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS
> +static int update_tls_keys(struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + cancel_work(&queue->io_work);
> + handshake_req_cancel(queue->sock->sk);
> + handshake_sk_destruct_req(queue->sock->sk);
> + queue->state = NVMET_TCP_Q_TLS_HANDSHAKE;
> +
> + /* Restore the default callbacks before starting upcall */
> + read_lock_bh(&queue->sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
> + queue->sock->sk->sk_data_ready = queue->data_ready;
> + queue->sock->sk->sk_state_change = queue->state_change;
> + queue->sock->sk->sk_write_space = queue->write_space;
> + queue->sock->sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
> + read_unlock_bh(&queue->sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
> +
> + nvmet_stop_keep_alive_timer(queue->nvme_sq.ctrl);
> +
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&queue->tls_handshake_tmo_work,
> + nvmet_tcp_tls_handshake_timeout);
> +
> + ret = nvmet_tcp_tls_handshake(queue, HANDSHAKE_KEY_UPDATE_TYPE_RECEIVED);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&queue->tls_complete, 10 * HZ);
> +
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + tls_handshake_cancel(queue->sock->sk);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + queue->state = NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> @@ -1408,14 +1474,22 @@ static void nvmet_tcp_io_work(struct work_struct *w)
> ret = nvmet_tcp_try_recv(queue, NVMET_TCP_RECV_BUDGET, &ops);
> if (ret > 0)
> pending = true;
> - else if (ret < 0)
> - return;
> + else if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret == -EKEYEXPIRED)
> + update_tls_keys(queue);
> + else
> + return;
> + }
>
What happens if CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS is disabled?
I suspect the kernel build will fail with an update_tls_keys
implicit declaration error.
Maurizio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 2:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] nvme-tcp: Support receiving KeyUpdate requests alistair23
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] net/handshake: Store the key serial number on completion alistair23
2025-09-05 13:18 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] net/handshake: Make handshake_req_cancel public alistair23
2025-09-05 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] net/handshake: Expose handshake_sk_destruct_req publically alistair23
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] nvmet: Expose nvmet_stop_keep_alive_timer publically alistair23
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] net/handshake: Support KeyUpdate message types alistair23
2025-09-05 13:23 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] nvme-tcp: Support KeyUpdate alistair23
2025-09-16 13:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-17 3:14 ` Alistair Francis
2025-09-17 10:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-17 10:56 ` Alistair Francis
2025-09-05 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] nvmet-tcp: " alistair23
2025-09-05 5:52 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-09-05 13:19 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2025-09-05 13:25 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-05 14:01 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-15 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] nvme-tcp: Support receiving KeyUpdate requests Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-15 16:31 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-09-16 0:50 ` Alistair Francis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DCKWAZAH7QNO.3739YP7O69XKZ@bsdbackstore.eu \
--to=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox