From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: mwilck@suse.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: marting@netapp.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: multipath: round-robin: don't fall back to numa
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:10:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e093b456-b854-c10a-2bdf-ecc8cac54e5b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716195929.28399-2-mwilck@suse.com>
On 7/16/20 9:59 PM, mwilck@suse.com wrote:
> From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
>
> Currently, if the RR path selector returns a non-optimized path,
> we fall back to __nvme_find_path(), which uses the logic of the
> numa path selector. For a given numa node, this always chooses
> the same path, thus preventing round-robin logic on non-optimized
> paths.
>
> By handling the situation where the current ns is NULL in
> nvme_round_robin_path(), we can avoid falling back from round-robin
> to NUMA, fixing the issue. The iopolicy case distinction in
> __nvme_find_path() can be skipped now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> index 2c575b783d3e..ff93bab0d549 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> @@ -181,10 +181,7 @@ static struct nvme_ns *__nvme_find_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head, int node)
> if (nvme_path_is_disabled(ns))
> continue;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_NUMA)
> - distance = node_distance(node, ns->ctrl->numa_node);
> - else
> - distance = LOCAL_DISTANCE;
> + distance = node_distance(node, ns->ctrl->numa_node);
>
> switch (ns->ana_state) {
> case NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED:
> @@ -225,7 +222,13 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
> int node, struct nvme_ns *old)
> {
> struct nvme_ns *ns, *found = NULL;
> + bool was_null = (old == NULL);
>
> + if (unlikely(was_null))
> + old = list_first_or_null_rcu(&head->list,
> + struct nvme_ns, siblings);
> + if (unlikely(!old))
> + return NULL;
>
> for (ns = nvme_next_ns(head, old);
> ns != old;
> @@ -244,9 +247,12 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
> /* Fall back to old if it's better than the others */
> if (!nvme_path_is_disabled(old) &&
> (old->ana_state == NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED ||
> - (!found && old->ana_state == NVME_ANA_NONOPTIMIZED)))
> + (!found && old->ana_state == NVME_ANA_NONOPTIMIZED))) {
> found = old;
> -
> + if (!was_null)
> + /* No need to switch */
> + return found;
> + }
> if (!found)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -267,8 +273,9 @@ inline struct nvme_ns *nvme_find_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> struct nvme_ns *ns;
>
> ns = srcu_dereference(head->current_path[node], &head->srcu);
> - if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR && ns)
> - ns = nvme_round_robin_path(head, node, ns);
> + if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR)
> + return nvme_round_robin_path(head, node, ns);
> +
> if (unlikely(!ns || !nvme_path_is_optimized(ns)))
> ns = __nvme_find_path(head, node);
> return ns;
>
Why not modify the last if clause to just
if (unlikely(!ns))
?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-16 19:59 [PATCH 1/2] nvme: multipath: round-robin: fix logic for non-optimized paths mwilck
2020-07-16 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: multipath: round-robin: don't fall back to numa mwilck
2020-07-17 6:10 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-07-17 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: multipath: round-robin: fix logic for non-optimized paths Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-20 19:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-21 6:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-21 17:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-22 5:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e093b456-b854-c10a-2bdf-ecc8cac54e5b@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marting@netapp.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox