From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme: fix implicit bool to flags conversion
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:29:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e57dba8f-b90a-4052-8dfe-e850c9cd9ea6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCyj1Yk6UT1x0Ysj@kbusch-mbp>
On 5/20/25 16:46, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:42:36AM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:28 AM Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> nvme_map_user_request() takes flags as the last argument, but
>>> nvme_uring_cmd_io() shoves a bool "vec" into it. It behaves as
>>> expected because bool is converted to 0/1 and NVME_IOCTL_VEC is
>>> defined as 1, but it's better to pass flags explicitly.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7b7fdb8e2dbc1 ("nvme: replace the "bool vec" arguments with flags in the ioctl path")
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>>
>> Keith had an earlier patch to fix this, but looks like the series
>> never got merged:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20250224182128.2042061-4-kbusch@meta.com/
>> This approach also looks fine to me, but not sure if it will
>> complicate some of the changes Keith wanted to make.
Aha, so it was caught before, that's good.
> Thanks, but no need to wait on me for this. I will revisit these
> cleanups someday once I can arrange for fewer distractions, which may
> not be any time soon.
>
> Patch looks good to me too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
In which case it'd make sense to take this patch, but no objection
in either case.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250520152811epcas5p3a0c63ffa250d376b3a9bec758fd12524@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-05-20 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/1] nvme: fix implicit bool to flags conversion Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-20 15:21 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-20 15:38 ` Anuj gupta
2025-05-20 15:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-20 15:46 ` Keith Busch
2025-05-21 9:29 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-05-20 15:51 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-05-20 19:17 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-05-21 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e57dba8f-b90a-4052-8dfe-e850c9cd9ea6@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox