Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@kernel.dk,
	chaitanyak@nvidia.com
Cc: gjoyce@linux.ibm.com, elver@google.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::uuid
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:31:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3ab5d9d-cdf9-4e9c-b0ad-167cc88fdfef@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00124916-2b34-412b-afbb-04b91546478c@acm.org>

On 11/10/26 3:28 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/8/26 7:28 PM, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> [ ... ]
> 
> This patch breaks compilation in nvmet_ns_alloc() because uuid_gen(&ns->uuid)
> is called without holding subsys->lock. This is fixed only in patch 12.
> Please move patch 12 before patch 11 (or squash them).

The intention of this series is to first annotate a field in struct nvmet_ns
and then address any locking violations reported by the clang context analyzer
in a subsequent patch. I split the annotation and the corresponding locking
changes into separate patches to make the changes easier to review.

Also, since I haven't enabled CONTEXT_ANALYSIS:= y in the NVMe target Makefile yet,
enabling CONFIG_WARN_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS alone should not cause this compilation
failure.

> In nvmet_ns_device_uuid_show(), please use guard(mutex)(&ns->subsys->lock).
> Do you think using guard(...) is more appropriate then simple mutex_lock()
and mutex_unlock() APIs? I find using conventional mutex_lock()/mutex_unlcok()
APIs more readable and easy to reason about then using guard(...). That said,
if others as well prefer using guard() them I'm open to switch to it.

Thanks,
--Nilay


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  3:28 [PATCH 00/23] nvmet: add context annotation for params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  6:38     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-10 17:29       ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-11  7:25         ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-11 18:00           ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-12  9:04             ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-12 17:35               ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::bdev access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  6:49     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:53   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  7:12     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 04/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev_file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 05/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::readonly Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nsid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  8:50     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 07/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::nsid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::blksize_shift Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::size Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nguid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::uuid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  9:01     ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 12/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::uuid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::buffered_io Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 14/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::buffered_io access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 15/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::enabled Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] nvmet: fix access to nvmet_ns::enable using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::device_path Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::device_path access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] nvmet: add context annotation for PCI P2P parameters in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] nvmet: fix PCI P2P parameters access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 22:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 21/23] nvmet: add context annotation for integrity params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 22/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::csi Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 23/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::debugfs_dir Nilay Shroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3ab5d9d-cdf9-4e9c-b0ad-167cc88fdfef@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox