Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nilay Shroff" <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::file
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 20:20:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205572@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109033102.982191-28-nilay@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [Critical] nvmet: slba shift overflow in nvmet_file_execute_discard()
  [1]
--

commit 0b0e76ffccc07fe576097865269793cd78b566d9
Author: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>

nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::file

This commit annotates nvmet_ns::file with __guarded_by(&subsys->lock),
introduces the nvmet_ns_file() helper for lockless I/O hotpath accesses,
and adds __must_hold(&ns->subsys->lock) annotations to the file-backed
namespace helpers.

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
> index 695963dd932ee..4307232c9160c 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -293,7 +306,7 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_discard(struct nvmet_req *req)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		ret = vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len);
> +		ret = vfs_fallocate(nvmet_ns_file(req->ns), mode, offset, len);
>  		if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>  			req->error_slba = le64_to_cpu(range.slba);
>  			status = errno_to_nvme_status(req, ret);
> @@ -347,7 +360,7 @@ static void nvmet_file_write_zeroes_work(struct work_struct *w)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len);
> +	ret = vfs_fallocate(nvmet_ns_file(req->ns), mode, offset, len);
>  	nvmet_req_complete(req, ret < 0 ? errno_to_nvme_status(req, ret) : 0);
>  }

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can shifting slba by
req->ns->blksize_shift in nvmet_file_execute_discard() and
nvmet_file_write_zeroes_work() overflow offset [1]?

drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c:nvmet_file_execute_discard() {
	...
		offset = le64_to_cpu(range.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
		len = le32_to_cpu(range.nlb);
		len <<= req->ns->blksize_shift;
		if (offset + len > req->ns->size) {
	...
}

drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c:nvmet_file_write_zeroes_work() {
	...
	offset = le64_to_cpu(write_zeroes->slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
	len = (((sector_t)le16_to_cpu(write_zeroes->length) + 1) <<
			req->ns->blksize_shift);

	if (unlikely(offset + len > req->ns->size)) {
	...
}

When a Discard or Write Zeroes command carries non-zero bits in the upper
blksize_shift bits of slba, the left shift discards those bits or wraps
the signed loff_t offset (or offset + len).  If the truncated result falls
within [0, req->ns->size - len], the bounds check is bypassed and
vfs_fallocate() punches holes or zeroes data at an unintended offset in
the backing file instead of failing with NVME_SC_CAP_EXCEEDED.  If offset
wraps to a negative value, vfs_fallocate() fails with -EINVAL and the
request completes with NVME_SC_INTERNAL rather than NVME_SC_CAP_EXCEEDED.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-db20adf5-cf8b-4a83-bea6-a689b8eaa9de

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109033102.982191-25-nilay@linux.ibm.com?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  3:28 [PATCH 00/23] nvmet: add context annotation for params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  6:38     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-10 17:29       ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-11  7:25         ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-11 18:00           ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-12  9:04             ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::bdev access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  6:49     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 21:53   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  7:12     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 04/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev_file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 05/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::readonly Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nsid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  8:50     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 07/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::nsid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::blksize_shift Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::size Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nguid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::uuid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10  9:01     ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 12/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::uuid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::buffered_io Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 14/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::buffered_io access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 15/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::enabled Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] nvmet: fix access to nvmet_ns::enable using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::device_path Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::device_path access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] nvmet: add context annotation for PCI P2P parameters in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] nvmet: fix PCI P2P parameters access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 22:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 21/23] nvmet: add context annotation for integrity params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 22/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::csi Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09  3:28 ` [PATCH 23/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::debugfs_dir Nilay Shroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205572@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox