From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mauricio Faria de Oliveira" <mfo@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 19:26:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-195914@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-nvme-double-cmpl-uaf-blk-mq-v1-1-b10fea474423@igalia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] nvme: unratelimited dev_err() in nvme_find_rq() on completion irq path
--
commit 2696cd6e7dfab32aa750573cdd163f831092e123
Author: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight
This commit checks that a request looked up in nvme_find_rq() is in the
MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT state before returning it for completion, avoiding a NULL
pointer dereference on rq->mq_hctx when a spurious completion matches an
idle request.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20260522153034.2168862-1-coshi036@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20260715005105.1115958-1-coshi036@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index 2d8f681079e85..3ba0666da7be6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@ static inline struct request *nvme_find_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> tag, genctr, nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr));
> return NULL;
> }
> + if (unlikely(blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)) {
> + dev_err(nvme_req(rq)->ctrl->device,
> + "completion for request %#x not in flight\n", tag);
> + return NULL;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Should this use dev_err_ratelimited() instead of dev_err()?
Commit c05c86681170 ("nvme: ratelimit the completion-path messages driven
by device data") switched the existing error messages in nvme_find_rq() and
nvme_handle_cqe() to ratelimited variants because device-supplied command
IDs are processed directly in interrupt context via
nvme_irq()->nvme_poll_cq()->nvme_handle_cqe()->nvme_find_rq() (as well as
in the apple, rdma, tcp, and loop completion handlers):
drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h:nvme_find_rq() {
...
rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag);
if (unlikely(!rq)) {
pr_err_ratelimited("could not locate request for tag %#x\n",
tag);
return NULL;
}
if (unlikely(nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr) != genctr)) {
dev_err_ratelimited(nvme_req(rq)->ctrl->device,
"request %#x genctr mismatch (got %#x expected %#x)\n",
tag, genctr, nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr));
return NULL;
}
}
Because nvme_find_rq() returns NULL before nvme_try_complete_req()
increments nvme_req(rq)->genctr, a malfunctioning controller or remote
Fabrics target sending repeated completions for an idle request with a
matching tag and generation counter will hit this path on every completion
and flood the kernel log from interrupt context.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-nvme-double-cmpl-uaf-blk-mq-v1-1-b10fea474423@igalia.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 19:18 [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:21 ` K
2026-11-03 19:41 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 19:43 ` Keith Busch
2026-11-03 19:47 ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-03 19:54 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-03 20:06 ` Keith Busch
2026-11-04 19:46 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-04 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-04 20:08 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-04 20:11 ` Keith Busch
2026-11-04 20:21 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-22 15:30 Chao Shi
2026-05-25 20:27 ` Chao S
2026-05-27 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-27 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-15 0:03 ` Chao S
2026-05-27 15:00 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-195914@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mfo@igalia.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox