Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mauricio Faria de Oliveira" <mfo@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 19:26:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-195914@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-nvme-double-cmpl-uaf-blk-mq-v1-1-b10fea474423@igalia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] nvme: unratelimited dev_err() in nvme_find_rq() on completion irq path
--

commit 2696cd6e7dfab32aa750573cdd163f831092e123
Author: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>

nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight

This commit checks that a request looked up in nvme_find_rq() is in the
MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT state before returning it for completion, avoiding a NULL
pointer dereference on rq->mq_hctx when a spurious completion matches an
idle request.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20260522153034.2168862-1-coshi036@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20260715005105.1115958-1-coshi036@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index 2d8f681079e85..3ba0666da7be6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@ static inline struct request *nvme_find_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>  			tag, genctr, nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr));
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> +	if (unlikely(blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)) {
> +		dev_err(nvme_req(rq)->ctrl->device,
> +			"completion for request %#x not in flight\n", tag);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
Should this use dev_err_ratelimited() instead of dev_err()?

Commit c05c86681170 ("nvme: ratelimit the completion-path messages driven
by device data") switched the existing error messages in nvme_find_rq() and
nvme_handle_cqe() to ratelimited variants because device-supplied command
IDs are processed directly in interrupt context via
nvme_irq()->nvme_poll_cq()->nvme_handle_cqe()->nvme_find_rq() (as well as
in the apple, rdma, tcp, and loop completion handlers):

drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h:nvme_find_rq() {
	...
	rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag);
	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
		pr_err_ratelimited("could not locate request for tag %#x\n",
				   tag);
		return NULL;
	}
	if (unlikely(nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr) != genctr)) {
		dev_err_ratelimited(nvme_req(rq)->ctrl->device,
			"request %#x genctr mismatch (got %#x expected %#x)\n",
			tag, genctr, nvme_genctr_mask(nvme_req(rq)->genctr));
		return NULL;
	}
}

Because nvme_find_rq() returns NULL before nvme_try_complete_req()
increments nvme_req(rq)->genctr, a malfunctioning controller or remote
Fabrics target sending repeated completions for an idle request with a
matching tag and generation counter will hit this path on every completion
and flood the kernel log from interrupt context.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-nvme-double-cmpl-uaf-blk-mq-v1-1-b10fea474423@igalia.com?part=1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 19:18 [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:21 ` K
2026-11-03 19:41   ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 19:43 ` Keith Busch
2026-11-03 19:47   ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-03 19:54   ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-03 19:59     ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-03 20:06     ` Keith Busch
2026-11-04 19:46       ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-04 20:01         ` Jens Axboe
2026-11-04 20:08           ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-11-04 20:11         ` Keith Busch
2026-11-04 20:21           ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-22 15:30 Chao Shi
2026-05-25 20:27 ` Chao S
2026-05-27 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-27 15:02   ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-15  0:03     ` Chao S
2026-05-27 15:00 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-195914@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mfo@igalia.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox