* [PATCH 0/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data on a live queue
@ 2026-11-09 19:04 Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
Hannes Reinecke
Cc: Martin Belanger, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, Martin Belanger,
stable
After the TLS handshake, a peer may send records that carry no
application data: a NewSessionTicket, a KeyUpdate or an alert.
tls_sw_read_sock() cannot pass such a record to nvme_tcp_recv_skb().
It returns -EINVAL and leaves the record at the head of the receive
queue. Since commit 288cfa187208 ("nvme-tcp: start error recovery when
read_sock fails"), nvme-tcp then starts error recovery, and the
controller reconnects.
TLS 1.3 allows a server to send a NewSessionTicket at any time after
the handshake (RFC 8446, section 4.6.1). Alerts can also arrive at any
time.
Patch 1 moves the TLS record read loop into a helper. No functional
change.
Patch 2 reads the record with recvmsg() when read_sock() returns
-EINVAL, and handles it by type. Handshake messages other than
KeyUpdate are discarded and alerts are logged. A fatal alert, a
KeyUpdate or another record type fails the queue.
This is the follow-up announced in the cover letter of "nvme-tcp:
handle TLS control records at connect and on receive errors":
https://patch.msgid.link/20261027-nvme-tcp-ctrlrec-fixes-v2-0-9656395ebcf2@gmail.com
Both patches are tagged for stable, because 288cfa187208 is being
backported to 6.12, 6.18 and 7.3.
Tool use
========
I developed this series with the help of an LLM coding assistant. It
drafted code, tests and changelogs, and helped with analysis of the
kTLS and sunrpc sources. I reviewed, edited and tested all of it, and
I am responsible for the content.
Testing
=======
Host and target in one VM (virtme-ng), on 7.4-rc2. A test-only change
to net/tls makes the target send records on a live I/O queue during
I/O. Each case writes data and reads it back with O_DIRECT.
Records sent by the target 7.4-rc2 With this series
--------------------------- ---------- --------------------------
NewSessionTicket, 64 bytes reconnect queue stays live
2 x 300, 2 x 1000, 6 x 64 reconnect queue stays live
close_notify alert reconnect queue stays live
warning alert (90) reconnect queue stays live, logged
fatal alert (40) reconnect reconnect, logged
KeyUpdate reconnect reconnect, logged
Data was correct in all cases. Also built with W=1, with and without
CONFIG_NVME_TCP_TLS.
Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
---
Martin Belanger (2):
nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper
nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data
drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 7475ea8b58616b33c04afb976cf0fbaad9dd63fb
change-id: 20261109-nvme-tcp-live-ctrlrec-4539b9390301
Best regards,
--
Martin Belanger <martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper 2026-11-09 19:04 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data on a live queue Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:04 ` Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:11 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, Hannes Reinecke Cc: Martin Belanger, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, Martin Belanger, stable From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> Move the read loop out of nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record() into a new helper, nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(). The next patch uses the helper to read TLS records that arrive on a live queue. No functional change. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> --- drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c index 7ecc6c007f8d..bf71e6f6a6ef 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c @@ -1623,31 +1623,16 @@ static int nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, } /* - * Discard a TLS record that arrived in place of the ICResp. A peer may send - * a NewSessionTicket as soon as the handshake completes. + * Read the rest of a TLS record whose first part was read into @msg. * - * Returns 0 when the record was discarded and the ICResp can be read, or a - * negative errno if the connection cannot continue. + * Returns the bytes read, or a negative errno. */ -static int nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, - struct msghdr *msg, u8 ctype, int len) +static int nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, + struct msghdr *msg, int flags) { u8 buf[NVME_TCP_TLS_REC_CHUNK]; - int ret; + int ret, drained = 0; - switch (ctype) { - case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE: - break; - case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_ALERT: - ret = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(queue, msg, len); - return ret ? : -ENOTCONN; - default: - pr_err("queue %d: unhandled TLS record %u\n", - nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), ctype); - return -ENOTCONN; - } - - /* the ICResp is in a later record, drain this one first */ while (!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR)) { struct kvec iov = { .iov_base = buf, @@ -1661,16 +1646,47 @@ static int nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, }; ret = kernel_recvmsg(queue->sock, &drain, &iov, 1, sizeof(buf), - 0); + flags); if (ret <= 0) { pr_warn("queue %d: failed to drain TLS record: %d\n", nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), ret); return ret ? : -ECONNRESET; } + drained += ret; msg->msg_flags = drain.msg_flags; } - return 0; + return drained; +} + +/* + * Discard a TLS record that arrived in place of the ICResp. A peer may send + * a NewSessionTicket as soon as the handshake completes. + * + * Returns 0 when the record was discarded and the ICResp can be read, or a + * negative errno if the connection cannot continue. + */ +static int nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, + struct msghdr *msg, u8 ctype, int len) +{ + int ret; + + switch (ctype) { + case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE: + break; + case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_ALERT: + ret = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(queue, msg, len); + return ret ? : -ENOTCONN; + default: + pr_err("queue %d: unhandled TLS record %u\n", + nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), ctype); + return -ENOTCONN; + } + + /* the ICResp is in a later record, drain this one first */ + ret = nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(queue, msg, 0); + + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; } /* -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:11 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-09 19:30 ` Martin Belanger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-09 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Belanger; +Cc: linux-nvme Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not introduce: - [Medium] nvme-tcp: unaligned cmsghdr access in nvme_tcp_init_connection() [1] -- commit b550db6841afde16fa08cb67f259ffa9462cfbdb Author: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper This commit extracts the TLS record draining loop from nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record() into a new nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record() helper. > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > index 7ecc6c007f8d4..bf71e6f6a6ef6 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > @@ -1623,31 +1623,16 @@ static int nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, > } > > /* > - * Discard a TLS record that arrived in place of the ICResp. A peer may send > - * a NewSessionTicket as soon as the handshake completes. > + * Read the rest of a TLS record whose first part was read into @msg. > * > - * Returns 0 when the record was discarded and the ICResp can be read, or a > - * negative errno if the connection cannot continue. > + * Returns the bytes read, or a negative errno. > */ > -static int nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, > - struct msghdr *msg, u8 ctype, int len) > +static int nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, > + struct msghdr *msg, int flags) > { > u8 buf[NVME_TCP_TLS_REC_CHUNK]; > - int ret; > + int ret, drained = 0; > > - switch (ctype) { > - case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE: > - break; > - case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_ALERT: > - ret = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(queue, msg, len); > - return ret ? : -ENOTCONN; > - default: > - pr_err("queue %d: unhandled TLS record %u\n", > - nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), ctype); > - return -ENOTCONN; > - } > - > - /* the ICResp is in a later record, drain this one first */ > while (!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR)) { > struct kvec iov = { > .iov_base = buf, > @@ -1661,16 +1646,47 @@ static int nvme_tcp_skip_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, > }; > > ret = kernel_recvmsg(queue->sock, &drain, &iov, 1, sizeof(buf), > - 0); > + flags); [Severity: Medium] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can passing the unaligned char cbuf[] array as msg_control [1] cause unaligned struct cmsghdr accesses? Both here in nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record() and in its caller nvme_tcp_recv_icresp() (called from nvme_tcp_init_connection()), cbuf is declared as a plain char array with 1-byte alignment: drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c:nvme_tcp_recv_icresp() { char cbuf[CMSG_LEN(sizeof(char))]; ... if (nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue)) { msg.msg_control = cbuf; msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cbuf); } msg.msg_flags = MSG_WAITALL; ret = kernel_recvmsg(queue->sock, &msg, &iov, 1, iov.iov_len, msg.msg_flags); if (ret <= 0 || !nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue)) return ret; ctype = tls_get_record_type(queue->sock->sk, (struct cmsghdr *)cbuf); } During kernel_recvmsg(), put_cmsg() casts msg->msg_control to struct cmsghdr * and writes fields such as cmsg_len directly, and tls_get_record_type() likewise dereferences cbuf as a struct cmsghdr. If the compiler places cbuf at a stack offset not aligned to __alignof__(struct cmsghdr), these accesses trigger UBSAN alignment warnings or alignment faults on strict-alignment architectures. [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-1e37cffb-41dc-487d-9c96-e0b9b82c4e63 -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109-nvme-tcp-live-ctrlrec-v1-0-47ba61670e65@gmail.com?part=1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper 2026-11-09 19:11 ` sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-09 19:30 ` Martin Belanger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Belanger @ 2026-11-09 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sashiko-reviews Cc: linux-nvme, Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, Hannes Reinecke, linux-kernel On 11/9/26 14:11, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > [Severity: Medium] > This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can passing the unaligned > char cbuf[] array as msg_control [1] cause unaligned struct cmsghdr > accesses? The report is correct. The char cbuf[CMSG_LEN(sizeof(char))] pattern gives the buffer 1-byte alignment, and put_cmsg() and tls_get_record_type() access it as a struct cmsghdr. The pattern exists since commit 2837966ab2a8 ("nvme-tcp: control message handling for recvmsg()"), and this series copies it into the two new receive paths. v2 will add a first patch that declares the host buffers as a union with struct cmsghdr, as sunrpc does in svcsock.c and xprtsock.c. The new code in this series will use the same declaration. I will wait for review of v1 before I post v2. nvmet-tcp uses the same pattern in four places. I will fix it in a separate patch. Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data 2026-11-09 19:04 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data on a live queue Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:04 ` Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:21 ` sashiko-bot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, Hannes Reinecke Cc: Martin Belanger, linux-nvme, linux-kernel, Martin Belanger, stable From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> A peer may send a TLS record without application data at any time after the handshake: a NewSessionTicket, a KeyUpdate or an alert. tls_sw_read_sock() cannot pass such a record to nvme_tcp_recv_skb(). It returns -EINVAL and leaves the record at the head of the receive queue. nvme_tcp_try_recv() then starts error recovery, and the controller reconnects. TLS 1.3 allows a server to send a NewSessionTicket at any time after the handshake (RFC 8446, section 4.6.1). Alerts can also arrive at any time. On -EINVAL, read the record with recvmsg(), which reports the record type. Discard handshake messages other than KeyUpdate. Log alerts, and fail the queue on a fatal alert. Fail the queue on a KeyUpdate, which nvme-tcp cannot answer, and on any other record type. recvmsg() takes the socket lock, so release it around the read. svc_tcp_recvfrom() in sunrpc handles -EINVAL from read_sock() the same way. Fixes: be8e82caa685 ("nvme-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> --- drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c index bf71e6f6a6ef..d460273a328a 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c @@ -1444,6 +1444,8 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) return ret; } +static int nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue); + static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) { struct socket *sock = queue->sock; @@ -1456,6 +1458,18 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) lock_sock(sk); queue->nr_cqe = 0; consumed = sock->ops->read_sock(sk, &rd_desc, nvme_tcp_recv_skb); + /* + * kTLS cannot pass a TLS record without application data to + * nvme_tcp_recv_skb(). It returns -EINVAL and leaves the record at + * the head of the receive queue. recvmsg() takes the socket lock, + * so read the record without it. + */ + if (unlikely(consumed == -EINVAL && nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue) && + queue->rd_enabled)) { + release_sock(sk); + consumed = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record(queue); + lock_sock(sk); + } /* * nvme_tcp_recv_skb() handles its own errors, so a queue that is * still enabled failed inside read_sock(). Handle it before @@ -1659,6 +1673,78 @@ static int nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, return drained; } +/* + * Read the TLS record that read_sock() could not pass to + * nvme_tcp_recv_skb(). The caller must not hold the socket lock. + * + * A KeyUpdate needs new keys that nothing here can supply. Other handshake + * messages, such as a NewSessionTicket, are discarded. + * + * Returns the bytes consumed, or a negative errno if the connection cannot + * continue. + */ +static int nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) +{ + u8 buf[NVME_TCP_TLS_REC_CHUNK]; + char cbuf[CMSG_LEN(sizeof(char))] = {}; + struct kvec iov = { + .iov_base = buf, + .iov_len = sizeof(buf), + }; + struct msghdr msg = { + .msg_control = cbuf, + .msg_controllen = sizeof(cbuf), + }; + int len, ret; + u8 ctype; + + len = kernel_recvmsg(queue->sock, &msg, &iov, 1, sizeof(buf), + MSG_DONTWAIT); + if (len <= 0) { + dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, + "queue %d: failed to read TLS record: %d\n", + nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), len); + goto fail; + } + + ctype = tls_get_record_type(queue->sock->sk, (struct cmsghdr *)cbuf); + switch (ctype) { + case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE: + if (buf[0] == TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE) { + dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, + "queue %d: peer sent a TLS KeyUpdate, which is not supported\n", + nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue)); + return -EKEYEXPIRED; + } + break; + case TLS_RECORD_TYPE_ALERT: + ret = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_alert(queue, &msg, len); + if (ret) + return ret; + break; + default: + dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, + "queue %d: unexpected TLS record %u\n", + nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue), ctype); + return -EPROTO; + } + + ret = nvme_tcp_drain_tls_record(queue, &msg, MSG_DONTWAIT); + if (ret < 0) { + len = ret; + goto fail; + } + + return len + ret; + +fail: + /* read_sock() left a whole record, so none of it can be missing */ + if (len == -EAGAIN) + return -EPROTO; + + return len ? : -ECONNRESET; +} + /* * Discard a TLS record that arrived in place of the ICResp. A peer may send * a NewSessionTicket as soon as the handshake completes. -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data Martin Belanger via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-09 19:21 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-09 19:36 ` Martin Belanger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-09 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Belanger; +Cc: linux-nvme Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue to consider: - [Medium] nvme-tcp: race in nvme_tcp_try_recv() when dropping socket lock for TLS -- commit 4ab07d4aae9edb0e5cd1d1957a5ff53b1dd8bb2d Author: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com> nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data This commit handles -EINVAL returns from read_sock() on TLS-enabled queues by dropping the socket lock and reading non-application-data TLS records via kernel_recvmsg(). > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > index bf71e6f6a6ef6..d460273a328a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > @@ -1444,6 +1444,8 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) > return ret; > } > > +static int nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue); > + > static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) > { > struct socket *sock = queue->sock; > @@ -1456,6 +1458,18 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) > lock_sock(sk); > queue->nr_cqe = 0; > consumed = sock->ops->read_sock(sk, &rd_desc, nvme_tcp_recv_skb); > + /* > + * kTLS cannot pass a TLS record without application data to > + * nvme_tcp_recv_skb(). It returns -EINVAL and leaves the record at > + * the head of the receive queue. recvmsg() takes the socket lock, > + * so read the record without it. > + */ > + if (unlikely(consumed == -EINVAL && nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue) && > + queue->rd_enabled)) { > + release_sock(sk); > + consumed = nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record(queue); > + lock_sock(sk); > + } [Severity: Medium] Can dropping the socket lock here let concurrent callers of nvme_tcp_try_recv() race on the same TLS control record? On a TLS-enabled poll queue, nvme_tcp_queue_request() always schedules queue->io_work, so nvme_tcp_io_work() and nvme_tcp_poll() (or two polling threads) can enter nvme_tcp_try_recv() concurrently without a queue-level lock: CPU0 (nvme_tcp_io_work) CPU1 (nvme_tcp_poll) nvme_tcp_try_recv() nvme_tcp_try_recv() lock_sock(sk) read_sock() -> -EINVAL release_sock(sk) lock_sock(sk) read_sock() -> -EINVAL release_sock(sk) nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record() kernel_recvmsg() nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record() kernel_recvmsg() <-- -EAGAIN or reads data record Once CPU0 consumes the control record, CPU1's kernel_recvmsg() either gets -EAGAIN (which nvme_tcp_recv_tls_record() turns into -EPROTO) or consumes up to 256 bytes of a following TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA record and fails with -EPROTO on the unexpected record type. In both cases nvme_tcp_try_recv() disables the queue and triggers nvme_tcp_error_recovery(). -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109-nvme-tcp-live-ctrlrec-v1-0-47ba61670e65@gmail.com?part=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data 2026-11-09 19:21 ` sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-09 19:36 ` Martin Belanger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Belanger @ 2026-11-09 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sashiko-reviews Cc: linux-nvme, Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, Hannes Reinecke, linux-kernel On 11/9/26 14:21, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > [Severity: Medium] > Can dropping the socket lock here let concurrent callers of > nvme_tcp_try_recv() race on the same TLS control record? The report is correct. On a poll queue, nvme_tcp_io_work() and nvme_tcp_poll() both call nvme_tcp_try_recv(). This patch releases the socket lock before recvmsg(), so both callers can see the same record. The second caller then fails the queue, and the controller reconnects. Without this patch, every such record leads to a reconnect. So the race does not make the result worse than today, but it is a bug in this patch. v2 will add a queue flag. The caller that gets -EINVAL from read_sock() sets it with test_and_set_bit() before it releases the socket lock, and clears it after it takes the lock again. A caller that finds the flag set returns 0 and leaves the record to the first one. The flag is set and tested only under the socket lock, so its owner knows the record at the head of the queue is the one read_sock() reported. v2 will also include the cmsg buffer fix from the report on patch 1, and a test with poll queues. Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-11-09 19:04 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data on a live queue Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-tcp: move the TLS record read loop into a helper Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:11 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-09 19:30 ` Martin Belanger 2026-11-09 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-tcp: consume TLS records without application data Martin Belanger via B4 Relay 2026-11-09 19:21 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-09 19:36 ` Martin Belanger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).