From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
t-kristo@ti.com,
linux-omap mailing list <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
Subject: Re: PM(?) problems on v3.3-rc1 on OMAP3
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:25:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327307143.1916.19.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120122074620.2715ce7f@notabene.brown>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1168 bytes --]
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 07:46 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:57:07 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> wrote:
> > In this case something is affecting the DSS (clocks? powers?), or the
> > memory, or the process of reading the pixels. I really don't see the MPU
> > or IRQs affecting this problem, except indirectly.
>
> Which clocks, exactly, are important?
>
> I collected some clock.c tracing while dss was repeatedly complaining about
> losing SYNC, and notice that omap_96m_fck was being enabled and disabled in
> hardware.
> omap_96m_fck is upstream for dss_96m_fck which provides the tv_dac_clk.
>
> Could it be this clock turning on and off which causes the problem?
I don't think 96m clock is important. At least I'm testing with plain
DPI, not tv-out. And I think missing 96m clock would just lead to a
missing image on the tv, not sync losts.
For OMAP3 DSS when using DPI the following clocks are important:
DPLL4_ALWON_FCLKOUTM4X2 (i.e. DSS1_ALWON_FCLK) (dss func clock)
DSS_L3_ICLK (to fetch pixels)
DSS_L4_ICLK (to configure dss registers)
I don't think any other clocks are used.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 10:33 PM(?) problems on v3.3-rc1 on OMAP3 Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 10:49 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 11:07 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 11:21 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:32 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 12:44 ` Govindraj
2012-01-21 7:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 7:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-20 11:56 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 12:34 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 12:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 13:36 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 15:00 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-22 11:11 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 8:53 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 9:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 9:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 9:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 10:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 11:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 11:06 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-24 10:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 12:45 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:47 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-01-21 7:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 7:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 15:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-21 20:46 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 8:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-01-21 20:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-22 11:11 ` Valkeinen, Tomi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327307143.1916.19.camel@deskari \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox