Re: [PATCH v2] OMAPDSS: Do not require a VDDS_DSI regulator on am35xx

[Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1402 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:53 -0400, Raphaël Assénat wrote:
> Hello Tomi,
> 
> On 21/08/12 06:39 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:16 -0400, Raphael Assenat wrote:
> >> On our AM3505 based board, dpi.c complains that there is no VDSS_DSI regulator
> >> and the framebuffer cannot be enabled. However, this check does not seem to
> >> apply to AM3505/17 chips.
> >>
> >> Taking into account comments received after my first patch[1], I have added
> >> entries to dss_features.c to support the am35xx soc. Then in dpi.c, instead
> >> of using cpu_is_omap34xx() and soc_is_am35xx(), a call to dss_has_feature()
> >> is used.
> >>
> >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=134272967203409&w=2
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Raphaël Assénat <raph@8d.com>
> > 
> > Chandrabhanu has posted a series that removes a bunch of cpu_is checks
> > from omapdss. On of them is the use of VDDS_DSI in dpi.c.
> > 
> > Can you wait until I've merged those patches to omapdss master branch
> > (probably a few days), and then create a new patch that adds AM35xx to
> > dss_features?
> 
> Please find a new version of the patch below. Due to the above mentioned changes, 
> the patch now only touches dss_features.c. 
> 
> Tested on am3505 only.
> 
> Diff based on git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git master.

Thanks, I'll apply this.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]