Re: [PATCH v2 0/0] McBSP changes for OMAP4 platform

[Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com>]

Hi,

On Thursday 06 May 2010 04:15:44 ext Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:
> The following patches enable McBSP driver to be used along with the
> audio driver in SDP4430 and other OMAP4 based boards.
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - Changed to correct IRQ lines.
> - Check if rx_irq is defined, instead of checking if cpu is omap4
> 
> Jorge Eduardo Candelaria (2):
>       ARM: McBSP: Fix request for irq in OMAP4
>       ARM: OMAP4: Add support for omap4 in McBSP driver
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c |   12 ++++--------
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c  |   34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Looks good with Jarkko's comment.
However, I'd like to ask Tony, Liam, Jarkko, and Mark the following:
Would it make sense to use the alsa tree for OMAP McBSP related patches, while 
keeping l-o in CC off course.
If we have patches for mcbsp pending in l-o and in alsa tree, than we are going 
to have hard times to sort things out when they need to be merged.

I'm asking this, because I will also have some patches for mcbsp, which will 
need change in arch/ and in sound/ as well.

I know that taking patches to alsa tree for the arch/ is unorthodox, but it will 
ease up our life in a long run...

What do you think?

-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html