Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC] ehci-omap: simple suspend implementation
@ 2018-02-16 17:14 Andreas Kemnade
       [not found] ` <20180216171414.8097-1-andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kemnade @ 2018-02-16 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, rogerq-l0cyMroinI0,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel
  Cc: Andreas Kemnade

This powers down the phy and on a gta04 it reduces
suspend current by 13 mA.
For unknown reasons usb does not power on properly.
Also calling usb_phy_shutdown() here feels wrong
apparently the reset line has to be activated.
usb_phy_set_suspend is not enough here. The power
consumption still stays approximately the same as
without any patch.

With a device connected the device does not enumerate
after resume. A rmmod ehci-omap ; modprobe ehci-omap
does not make it reenumerade.
So there is still something wrong here.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
index 8d8bafc70c1f..0be2ccf8182a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
@@ -266,6 +266,58 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+
+static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	ret = ehci_suspend(hcd, false);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "ehci suspend failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
+		if (omap->phy[i])
+			usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
+	}
+	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
+	int i;
+
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+	/*
+	 * An undocumented "feature" in the OMAP3 EHCI controller,
+	 * causes suspended ports to be taken out of suspend when
+	 * the USBCMD.Run/Stop bit is cleared (for example when
+	 * we do ehci_bus_suspend).
+	 * This breaks suspend-resume if the root-hub is allowed
+	 * to suspend. Writing 1 to this undocumented register bit
+	 * disables this feature and restores normal behavior.
+	 */
+	ehci_write(hcd->regs, EHCI_INSNREG04,
+		   EHCI_INSNREG04_DISABLE_UNSUSPEND);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
+		if (omap->phy[i]) {
+			usb_phy_init(omap->phy[i]);
+			usb_phy_set_suspend(omap->phy[i], false);
+		}
+	}
+
+	ehci_resume(hcd, true);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id omap_ehci_dt_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,ehci-omap" },
 	{ }
@@ -273,14 +325,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_ehci_dt_ids[] = {
 
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_ehci_dt_ids);
 
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ehci_omap_pm_ops, ehci_omap_suspend,
+			 ehci_omap_resume);
+
+
 static struct platform_driver ehci_hcd_omap_driver = {
 	.probe			= ehci_hcd_omap_probe,
 	.remove			= ehci_hcd_omap_remove,
 	.shutdown		= usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
-	/*.suspend		= ehci_hcd_omap_suspend, */
-	/*.resume		= ehci_hcd_omap_resume, */
 	.driver = {
 		.name		= hcd_name,
+		.pm		= &ehci_omap_pm_ops,
 		.of_match_table = omap_ehci_dt_ids,
 	}
 };
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] ehci-omap: simple suspend implementation
       [not found] ` <20180216171414.8097-1-andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2018-02-16 18:13   ` Alan Stern
       [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1802161302300.1402-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2018-02-16 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Kemnade
  Cc: gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, rogerq-l0cyMroinI0,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Andreas Kemnade wrote:

> This powers down the phy and on a gta04 it reduces
> suspend current by 13 mA.
> For unknown reasons usb does not power on properly.
> Also calling usb_phy_shutdown() here feels wrong
> apparently the reset line has to be activated.
> usb_phy_set_suspend is not enough here. The power
> consumption still stays approximately the same as
> without any patch.
> 
> With a device connected the device does not enumerate
> after resume. A rmmod ehci-omap ; modprobe ehci-omap
> does not make it reenumerade.
> So there is still something wrong here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> index 8d8bafc70c1f..0be2ccf8182a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,58 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> +	int ret;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	ret = ehci_suspend(hcd, false);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "ehci suspend failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
> +		if (omap->phy[i])
> +			usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
> +	}
> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);

Why do you include a runtime PM call here, given that the driver
doesn't support runtime suspend or resume?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +	/*
> +	 * An undocumented "feature" in the OMAP3 EHCI controller,
> +	 * causes suspended ports to be taken out of suspend when
> +	 * the USBCMD.Run/Stop bit is cleared (for example when
> +	 * we do ehci_bus_suspend).
> +	 * This breaks suspend-resume if the root-hub is allowed
> +	 * to suspend. Writing 1 to this undocumented register bit
> +	 * disables this feature and restores normal behavior.
> +	 */
> +	ehci_write(hcd->regs, EHCI_INSNREG04,
> +		   EHCI_INSNREG04_DISABLE_UNSUSPEND);

Doesn't this code belong in ehci_hcd_omap_probe()?  I assume you only
need to set this undocumented bit once, not every time the controller
is suspended.  And in any case, according to the comment, you would
need to take care of this before the root hub is suspended -- by the
time the controller is suspended, it is already too late.

Alan Stern

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
> +		if (omap->phy[i]) {
> +			usb_phy_init(omap->phy[i]);
> +			usb_phy_set_suspend(omap->phy[i], false);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ehci_resume(hcd, true);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id omap_ehci_dt_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,ehci-omap" },
>  	{ }
> @@ -273,14 +325,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_ehci_dt_ids[] = {
>  
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_ehci_dt_ids);
>  
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ehci_omap_pm_ops, ehci_omap_suspend,
> +			 ehci_omap_resume);
> +
> +
>  static struct platform_driver ehci_hcd_omap_driver = {
>  	.probe			= ehci_hcd_omap_probe,
>  	.remove			= ehci_hcd_omap_remove,
>  	.shutdown		= usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
> -	/*.suspend		= ehci_hcd_omap_suspend, */
> -	/*.resume		= ehci_hcd_omap_resume, */
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name		= hcd_name,
> +		.pm		= &ehci_omap_pm_ops,
>  		.of_match_table = omap_ehci_dt_ids,
>  	}
>  };
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] ehci-omap: simple suspend implementation
       [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1802161302300.1402-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
@ 2018-02-16 18:35       ` Andreas Kemnade
  2018-02-16 19:31         ` Alan Stern
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kemnade @ 2018-02-16 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Stern
  Cc: gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, rogerq-l0cyMroinI0,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3659 bytes --]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:13:11 -0500 (EST)
Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> 
> > This powers down the phy and on a gta04 it reduces
> > suspend current by 13 mA.
> > For unknown reasons usb does not power on properly.
> > Also calling usb_phy_shutdown() here feels wrong
> > apparently the reset line has to be activated.
> > usb_phy_set_suspend is not enough here. The power
> > consumption still stays approximately the same as
> > without any patch.
> > 
> > With a device connected the device does not enumerate
> > after resume. A rmmod ehci-omap ; modprobe ehci-omap
> > does not make it reenumerade.
> > So there is still something wrong here.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > index 8d8bafc70c1f..0be2ccf8182a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > @@ -266,6 +266,58 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	ret = ehci_suspend(hcd, false);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "ehci suspend failed: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
> > +		if (omap->phy[i])
> > +			usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
> > +	}
> > +	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);  
> 
> Why do you include a runtime PM call here, given that the driver
> doesn't support runtime suspend or resume?
> 
Well, the parent (drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c) has, and there are runtime PM
calls here in the _probe/_remove functions, so it seems to be sane to do it
here, too.


> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * An undocumented "feature" in the OMAP3 EHCI controller,
> > +	 * causes suspended ports to be taken out of suspend when
> > +	 * the USBCMD.Run/Stop bit is cleared (for example when
> > +	 * we do ehci_bus_suspend).
> > +	 * This breaks suspend-resume if the root-hub is allowed
> > +	 * to suspend. Writing 1 to this undocumented register bit
> > +	 * disables this feature and restores normal behavior.
> > +	 */
> > +	ehci_write(hcd->regs, EHCI_INSNREG04,
> > +		   EHCI_INSNREG04_DISABLE_UNSUSPEND);  
> 
> Doesn't this code belong in ehci_hcd_omap_probe()?  I assume you only
> need to set this undocumented bit once, not every time the controller
> is suspended.  And in any case, according to the comment, you would
> need to take care of this before the root hub is suspended -- by the
> time the controller is suspended, it is already too late.
>
 
I am not really sure about this one. It is set in ehci_hcd_omap_probe()
so it is set before suspend. I set it here to ensure it is re-set when
the controller is powered down too much to keep register contents. I
do not know if that is the case. But I thought it would not harm.

Regards,
Andreas

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] ehci-omap: simple suspend implementation
  2018-02-16 18:35       ` Andreas Kemnade
@ 2018-02-16 19:31         ` Alan Stern
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2018-02-16 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Kemnade
  Cc: gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, rogerq-l0cyMroinI0,
	Discussions about the Letux Kernel

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Andreas Kemnade wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:13:11 -0500 (EST)
> Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > 
> > > This powers down the phy and on a gta04 it reduces
> > > suspend current by 13 mA.
> > > For unknown reasons usb does not power on properly.
> > > Also calling usb_phy_shutdown() here feels wrong
> > > apparently the reset line has to be activated.
> > > usb_phy_set_suspend is not enough here. The power
> > > consumption still stays approximately the same as
> > > without any patch.
> > > 
> > > With a device connected the device does not enumerate
> > > after resume. A rmmod ehci-omap ; modprobe ehci-omap
> > > does not make it reenumerade.
> > > So there is still something wrong here.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > > index 8d8bafc70c1f..0be2ccf8182a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c
> > > @@ -266,6 +266,58 @@ static int ehci_hcd_omap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +
> > > +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +	int i;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = ehci_suspend(hcd, false);
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "ehci suspend failed: %d\n", ret);
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
> > > +		if (omap->phy[i])
> > > +			usb_phy_shutdown(omap->phy[i]);
> > > +	}
> > > +	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);  
> > 
> > Why do you include a runtime PM call here, given that the driver
> > doesn't support runtime suspend or resume?
> > 
> Well, the parent (drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c) has, and there are runtime PM
> calls here in the _probe/_remove functions, so it seems to be sane to do it
> here, too.

Not really -- when the whole system is going into suspend anyway, 
there's no point in trying to do a runtime suspend of the EHCI 
controller.  (In fact, the PM subsystem doesn't even allow it.)

> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __maybe_unused ehci_omap_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +	struct omap_hcd *omap = (struct omap_hcd *)hcd_to_ehci(hcd)->priv;
> > > +	int i;
> > > +
> > > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * An undocumented "feature" in the OMAP3 EHCI controller,
> > > +	 * causes suspended ports to be taken out of suspend when
> > > +	 * the USBCMD.Run/Stop bit is cleared (for example when
> > > +	 * we do ehci_bus_suspend).
> > > +	 * This breaks suspend-resume if the root-hub is allowed
> > > +	 * to suspend. Writing 1 to this undocumented register bit
> > > +	 * disables this feature and restores normal behavior.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	ehci_write(hcd->regs, EHCI_INSNREG04,
> > > +		   EHCI_INSNREG04_DISABLE_UNSUSPEND);  
> > 
> > Doesn't this code belong in ehci_hcd_omap_probe()?  I assume you only
> > need to set this undocumented bit once, not every time the controller
> > is suspended.  And in any case, according to the comment, you would
> > need to take care of this before the root hub is suspended -- by the
> > time the controller is suspended, it is already too late.
> >
>  
> I am not really sure about this one. It is set in ehci_hcd_omap_probe()
> so it is set before suspend. I set it here to ensure it is re-set when
> the controller is powered down too much to keep register contents. I
> do not know if that is the case. But I thought it would not harm.

Ah, okay.  That's reasonable.  But you should change the comment: Refer
the reader to the existing comment in ehci_hcd_omap_probe() instead of
duplicating it, and then explain that the undocumented bit might not
survive a loss of power.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-16 19:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-16 17:14 [PATCH RFC] ehci-omap: simple suspend implementation Andreas Kemnade
     [not found] ` <20180216171414.8097-1-andreas-cLv4Z9ELZ06ZuzBka8ofvg@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-16 18:13   ` Alan Stern
     [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1802161302300.1402-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-16 18:35       ` Andreas Kemnade
2018-02-16 19:31         ` Alan Stern

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox