Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] bus: ti-sysc: Ensure PRU-ICSS doesn't break suspend/resume
       [not found] ` <20190402133752.6912-5-rogerq@ti.com>
@ 2019-04-02 16:57   ` Tony Lindgren
  2019-04-03  8:46     ` Roger Quadros
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2019-04-02 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roger Quadros; +Cc: nsekhar, s-anna, linux-kernel, linux-omap

* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [190402 13:38]:
> The PRU-ICSS subsystem's SYSCONFIG register is similar to
> omap4-simple but has 2 special bits STANDBY_INIT and SUB_MWAIT.
> 
> The STANDBY_INIT bit initiates a Standby sequence (when set) and
> triggers a MStandby request to the SoC's PRCM module. This same
> bit is also used to enable the OCP master ports (when cleared).
> 
> Some PRU applications require the OCP master port access to be
> enabled thus keeping it out of standby.

So do we need to configure this depending on the application?

> During sustem suspend/resume we must ensure that the PRUSS is in
> standby else it will break resume.
> 
> NOTE:
> 1. This patch only adds the PM callbacks with code to fix the System
> Suspend/Resume hang issue on AM33xx/AM437x SoCs, but does not
> implement the full context save and restore required for the PRUSS
> drivers to work across system suspend/resume when the power domain
> is switched off (L4PER domain is switched OFF on AM335x/AM437x
> during system suspend/resume, so PRUSS modules do lose context).

I think we already restore the interconnect target module access
properly on resume. If not we should fix that.

Saving and restoring the child device state is up to the device
drivers managing the child device(s), and there's not much ti-sysc.c
can do about it, right?

> @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ struct sysc {
>  	bool enabled;
>  	bool needs_resume;
>  	bool child_needs_resume;
> +	bool in_standby;
>  	struct delayed_work idle_work;
>  };

We should start using bitfields for the bool here, might as well
already do it now:

unsigned long in_standby:1;

See "17) Using bool" in Documentation/process/coding-style.rst.

> @@ -1023,6 +1025,21 @@ static int __maybe_unused sysc_noirq_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	if (ddata->cfg.quirks & SYSC_QUIRK_LEGACY_IDLE)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if (ddata->cap->type == TI_SYSC_PRUSS) {

Should this test be made more generic based on the mstandby
bit being configured?

And can you please make these into separate functions to
avoid cluttering the suspend and resume functions. Something
like sysc_handle_mstandby() maybe?

> +		u32 reg, mask;
> +		const struct sysc_regbits *regbits = ddata->cap->regbits;
> +
> +		mask = BIT(regbits->standby_init_shift);
> +		reg = sysc_read(ddata, ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG]);
> +		ddata->in_standby = reg & mask;

Hmm so could we just assume that the device drivers for child device(s)
configure the MSTANDBY bit? Or do we need to manage it in ti-sysc?

See for example drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c omap2430_low_level_init()
and omap2430_low_level_exit(). That's a separate register though.

Regards,

Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] bus: ti-sysc: Ensure PRU-ICSS doesn't break suspend/resume
  2019-04-02 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] bus: ti-sysc: Ensure PRU-ICSS doesn't break suspend/resume Tony Lindgren
@ 2019-04-03  8:46     ` Roger Quadros
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2019-04-03  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tony Lindgren, s-anna; +Cc: nsekhar, linux-kernel, linux-omap

On 02/04/2019 19:57, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [190402 13:38]:
>> The PRU-ICSS subsystem's SYSCONFIG register is similar to
>> omap4-simple but has 2 special bits STANDBY_INIT and SUB_MWAIT.
>>
>> The STANDBY_INIT bit initiates a Standby sequence (when set) and
>> triggers a MStandby request to the SoC's PRCM module. This same
>> bit is also used to enable the OCP master ports (when cleared).
>>
>> Some PRU applications require the OCP master port access to be
>> enabled thus keeping it out of standby.
> 
> So do we need to configure this depending on the application?

Yes.
> 
>> During sustem suspend/resume we must ensure that the PRUSS is in
>> standby else it will break resume.
>>
>> NOTE:
>> 1. This patch only adds the PM callbacks with code to fix the System
>> Suspend/Resume hang issue on AM33xx/AM437x SoCs, but does not
>> implement the full context save and restore required for the PRUSS
>> drivers to work across system suspend/resume when the power domain
>> is switched off (L4PER domain is switched OFF on AM335x/AM437x
>> during system suspend/resume, so PRUSS modules do lose context).
> 
> I think we already restore the interconnect target module access
> properly on resume. If not we should fix that.
> 
> Saving and restoring the child device state is up to the device
> drivers managing the child device(s), and there's not much ti-sysc.c
> can do about it, right?

Agreed. In that case this handling should be done by pruss.c
and uio_pruss.c in their suspend/resume handlers.

Suman, do you agree?

> 
>> @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ struct sysc {
>>  	bool enabled;
>>  	bool needs_resume;
>>  	bool child_needs_resume;
>> +	bool in_standby;
>>  	struct delayed_work idle_work;
>>  };
> 
> We should start using bitfields for the bool here, might as well
> already do it now:
> 
> unsigned long in_standby:1;
> 
> See "17) Using bool" in Documentation/process/coding-style.rst.
> 
>> @@ -1023,6 +1025,21 @@ static int __maybe_unused sysc_noirq_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>  	if (ddata->cfg.quirks & SYSC_QUIRK_LEGACY_IDLE)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>> +	if (ddata->cap->type == TI_SYSC_PRUSS) {
> 
> Should this test be made more generic based on the mstandby
> bit being configured?

No other module uses this bit. It is specific to PRUSS.
> 
> And can you please make these into separate functions to
> avoid cluttering the suspend and resume functions. Something
> like sysc_handle_mstandby() maybe?
> 
>> +		u32 reg, mask;
>> +		const struct sysc_regbits *regbits = ddata->cap->regbits;
>> +
>> +		mask = BIT(regbits->standby_init_shift);
>> +		reg = sysc_read(ddata, ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG]);
>> +		ddata->in_standby = reg & mask;
> 
> Hmm so could we just assume that the device drivers for child device(s)
> configure the MSTANDBY bit? Or do we need to manage it in ti-sysc?
> 

I'm in favor of managing it in the child device driver.
Let's see if Suman has any concerns.

> See for example drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c omap2430_low_level_init()
> and omap2430_low_level_exit(). That's a separate register though.
> 

--
cheers,
-roger 
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-03  8:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190402133752.6912-1-rogerq@ti.com>
     [not found] ` <20190402133752.6912-5-rogerq@ti.com>
2019-04-02 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] bus: ti-sysc: Ensure PRU-ICSS doesn't break suspend/resume Tony Lindgren
2019-04-03  8:46     ` Roger Quadros

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox