Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/19] net: ti: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
       [not found] <20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com>
@ 2021-06-24 16:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-06-24 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, netdev
  Cc: Martin KaFai Lau, Hangbin Liu, Jesper Dangaard Brouer,
	Magnus Karlsson, Paul E . McKenney, Jakub Kicinski,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap

The cpsw driver has rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs around XDP
program invocations. However, the actual lifetime of the objects referred
by the XDP program invocation is longer, all the way through to the call to
xdp_do_flush(), making the scope of the rcu_read_lock() too small. This
turns out to be harmless because it all happens in a single NAPI poll
cycle (and thus under local_bh_disable()), but it makes the rcu_read_lock()
misleading.

Rather than extend the scope of the rcu_read_lock(), just get rid of it
entirely. With the addition of RCU annotations to the XDP_REDIRECT map
types that take bh execution into account, lockdep even understands this to
be safe, so there's really no reason to keep it around.

Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
index 5862f0a4a975..ecc2a6b7e28f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c
@@ -1328,13 +1328,9 @@ int cpsw_run_xdp(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
 	u32 act;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
 	prog = READ_ONCE(priv->xdp_prog);
-	if (!prog) {
-		ret = CPSW_XDP_PASS;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (!prog)
+		return CPSW_XDP_PASS;
 
 	act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, xdp);
 	/* XDP prog might have changed packet data and boundaries */
@@ -1378,10 +1374,8 @@ int cpsw_run_xdp(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
 	ndev->stats.rx_bytes += *len;
 	ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
 out:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
 drop:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	page_pool_recycle_direct(cpsw->page_pool[ch], page);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-06-24 16:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com>
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/19] net: ti: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox