From: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
To: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>, <andreas@kemnade.info>,
<khilman@baylibre.com>, <rogerq@kernel.org>, <tony@atomide.com>,
<lee@kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <m-leonard@ti.com>, <praneeth@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65214 PMIC bindings
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:03:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305210351.249811-3-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305210351.249811-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
- TPS65214 is a Power Management IC with 3 Buck regulators and 2 LDOs.
- TPS65214 has 2 LDOS and 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219 has 4 LDOs and 2 GPOs.
- TPS65214's LDO1 maps to TPS65219's LDO3.
- A key difference between TPS65215 & TPS65214 are the LDO current and
voltage output ranges and the configurable options available.
- The remaining features for both devices are the same.
Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
index b0d47415bf83..7c64e588a8b5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml#
$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
-title: TI TPS65215/TPS65219 Power Management Integrated Circuits
+title: TI TPS65214/TPS65215/TPS65219 Power Management Integrated Circuit
maintainers:
- Jerome Neanne <jerome.neanne@baylibre.com>
@@ -18,9 +18,13 @@ description: |
TI TPS65215 is a derivative of TPS65219 with 3 Buck regulators, 2 Low
Drop-out Regulators (LDOs), 1 GPIO, 1 GPO, and power-button.
+ TI TPS65214 is a derivative of TPS65219 with 3 Buck regulators, 2 Low
+ Drop-out Regulators (LDOs), 1 GPIO, 1 GPO, and power-button.
+
properties:
compatible:
enum:
+ - ti,tps65214
- ti,tps65215
- ti,tps65219
@@ -102,7 +106,9 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
- const: ti,tps65215
+ enum:
+ - ti,tps65214
+ - ti,tps65215
then:
properties:
regulators:
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 21:03 [PATCH v6 0/9] Add TI TPS65214 & TPS65215 MFD & Regulator Support Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` Shree Ramamoorthy [this message]
2025-03-06 7:25 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65214 " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-06 22:58 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] mfd: tps65219: Remove regmap_read check Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] mfd: tps65219: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] mfd: tps65219: Add support for TI TPS65214 PMIC Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] regulator: tps65219: Update struct names Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] regulator: tps65219: Add support for TPS65215 regulator resources Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] regulator: tps65219: Add support for TPS65215 Regulator IRQs Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-05 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] regulator: tps65219: Add TI TPS65214 Regulator Support Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-03-06 7:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] Add TI TPS65214 & TPS65215 MFD & " Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305210351.249811-3-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com \
--to=s-ramamoorthy@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-leonard@ti.com \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox