From: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org>,
Viresh Kumar
<viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List
<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:55:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4af419d0-9730-756f-916d-88e07e704448@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3046998.7dExGlRDb3-yvgW3jdyMHm1GS7QM15AGw@public.gmane.org>
On 02/10/2017 06:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2017 08:43:49 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 09-02-17, 23:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> In particular, Viresh, if you ACK something, please make sure that it
>>> doesn't conflict with your own patches.
>>
>> I hope you are talking about the patch 3/4 for which Arnd also sent a
>> fix. I acked it back on 18th of January and Dave has been carrying my
>> Ack since then. When he posted again, I didn't went into reviewing it
>> again as I saw my Ack being there.
>
> Well, OK, but you did know that the OPP API had changed in the meantime,
> so it wouldn't have hurt to double check I suppose?
>
>> Yes, he ended up using an API which just got updated after 18th of Jan
>> and yes both me and Dave missed that. But I feel it is difficult to
>> take care of scenarios like this. Perhaps he should have made sure
>> that he base it of pm/linux-next and nothing would have gone wrong.
>
> Yes, that would help, but then how to enforce that?
I apologize, I was unaware of the conflicting series. I'm not sure of a good way
to enforce it but I do agree I will make sure to rebase and test against
pm/linux-next before sending in the future.
Regards,
Dave
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-03 17:29 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: Introduce TI CPUFreq/OPP Driver Dave Gerlach
[not found] ` <20170203172929.23940-1-d-gerlach-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-03 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PM / OPP: Expose _of_get_opp_desc_node as dev_pm_opp API Dave Gerlach
2017-02-03 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq: ti: Add cpufreq driver to determine available OPPs at runtime Dave Gerlach
2017-02-03 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq Dave Gerlach
2017-02-08 14:44 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-08 14:45 ` Dave Gerlach
2017-02-09 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-09 15:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2017-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v6 " Dave Gerlach
2017-02-09 16:01 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-10 3:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-10 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <3046998.7dExGlRDb3-yvgW3jdyMHm1GS7QM15AGw@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-10 20:55 ` Dave Gerlach [this message]
2017-02-03 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] cpufreq: dt: Don't use generic platdev driver for ti-cpufreq platforms Dave Gerlach
2017-02-03 23:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: Introduce TI CPUFreq/OPP Driver Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4af419d0-9730-756f-916d-88e07e704448@ti.com \
--to=d-gerlach-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lukma-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox