Re: Failure to boot...

[Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>]

On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> Better yet (IMHO): just enable the zboot command in U-Boot to let you
>>> boot a zImage binary directly.
>>
>> I wish it were that easy but it isn't.  I've no idea where to get a
>> version of uboot for my boards which supports that; TI have always
>> supplied updates to uboot for me, and with the current state of TI
>> being afaict in chaos.
>>
>> TI have always supplied a replacement X-Loader with each uboot update.
>> I've no idea what X-Loader is or why both get updated together, but...
>>
>> Moreover, I doubt that the 3430LDP, of which there are multiple versions,
>> will ever see a uboot update.  It already suffers from a lack of correct
>> kernel support due to random wiring changes between these versions (the
>> keypad doesn't work correctly) and I've yet to indentify which version
>> it is despite downloading the circuits.  So trying to locate the right
>> uboot will be impossible there.
>>
>> So, I'm _stuck_ with uImages for these platforms.
>
> Right, so I'm now passing LOADADDR= which allows this to work - and the
> latest OMAP4430SDP boot result shows almost the same sad broken story.
>
I just tried latest mainline (commit: 04c2eee5) and default config
just boots fine.

I was looking at your build system output which shows the boot
state "OMAP4430 SDP: fail". Your config seems to be with
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM=y and indeed this kernel doesn't
boot. Seems to abort very early in boot. Am looking at it.

Regards,
Santosh

P.S Btw, the load address issue with multi-platform build
was highlighted on the list in past by Tony [1]

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg84146.html