From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
arm@kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Failure to boot...
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:40:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510A7B6B.1080600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510A78E1.8010308@ti.com>
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:30 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2013 06:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>>>>> Better yet (IMHO): just enable the zboot command in U-Boot to let you
>>>>>> boot a zImage binary directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish it were that easy but it isn't. I've no idea where to get a
>>>>> version of uboot for my boards which supports that; TI have always
>>>>> supplied updates to uboot for me, and with the current state of TI
>>>>> being afaict in chaos.
>>>>>
>>>>> TI have always supplied a replacement X-Loader with each uboot update.
>>>>> I've no idea what X-Loader is or why both get updated together, but...
>>>>>
>>>>> Moreover, I doubt that the 3430LDP, of which there are multiple
>>>>> versions,
>>>>> will ever see a uboot update. It already suffers from a lack of
>>>>> correct
>>>>> kernel support due to random wiring changes between these versions
>>>>> (the
>>>>> keypad doesn't work correctly) and I've yet to indentify which version
>>>>> it is despite downloading the circuits. So trying to locate the right
>>>>> uboot will be impossible there.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I'm _stuck_ with uImages for these platforms.
>>>>
>>>> Right, so I'm now passing LOADADDR= which allows this to work - and the
>>>> latest OMAP4430SDP boot result shows almost the same sad broken story.
>>>>
>>> I just tried latest mainline (commit: 04c2eee5) and default config
>>> just boots fine.
>>
>> Please read the notes at the bottom of the page, specifically:
>> * Build tree is currently created on an ad-hoc basis from Linus'
>> tip, rmk's
>> development tip and arm-soc for-next branches.
>>
>> This system does *not* build and boot vanilla mainline kernels. It is
>> (as the above says):
>>
>> - Linus' tip
>> - My for-next plus a few other bits
>> - arm-soc for-next
>>
>> all merged together.
>>
> Linus' tip(commit: 04c2eee5) + arm-soc for-next boots fine as well.
> The pull request from Tony [1] fixed the multi-platform boot issue
> for OMAP.
>
> Now trying to merge your for-next and test.
>
This is fine as well. I think the issue is the way uImage is created.
'make LOADADDRESS=XXXX uImage' actually doesn't work. Am using below
method to create an uImage.
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x80008000 -e 0x80008000 -n
"Linux" -d zImage uImage
Will you be able to try this out please ?
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 1:49 Failure to boot Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 3:02 ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-31 4:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-31 9:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 10:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 12:49 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-31 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 14:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-31 14:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-01-31 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 14:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 14:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-31 14:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 14:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-31 16:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-01-31 16:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 16:01 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-31 16:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 16:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-31 17:51 ` [PATCH, RFC] default machine descriptor for multiplatform Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-31 18:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-31 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-31 20:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-01 11:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-01 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-05 21:37 ` Rob Herring
2013-02-05 22:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-05 21:39 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510A7B6B.1080600@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox