From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: device-tree <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function for configuring GPMC settings
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:43:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5130CCA9.10905@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA90C2F@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On 02/28/2013 11:33 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 22:42:37, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>
>> On 02/28/2013 09:52 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/28/2013 12:05 AM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 23:00:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>>> The GPMC has various different configuration options such as bus-width,
>>>>> synchronous or asychronous mode selection, burst mode options etc.
>>>>> Currently, there is no common function for configuring these options and
>>>>> various devices set these options by either programming the GPMC CONFIG1
>>>>> register directly or by calling gpmc_cs_configure() to set some of the
>>>>> options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a new function for configuring all of the GPMC options. Having a common
>>>>> function for configuring this options will simplify code and ease the
>>>>> migration to device-tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h | 6 ++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> index 465cac9..fb8dfd2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,71 @@ int gpmc_calc_timings(struct gpmc_timings *gpmc_t,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +int gpmc_cs_program_settings(int cs, struct gpmc_settings *p)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + u32 config1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((!p->device_width) || (p->device_width > GPMC_DEVWIDTH_16BIT)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid width %d!", __func__, p->device_width);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Address-data multiplexing not supported for NAND devices */
>>>>> + if (p->device_nand && p->mux_add_data) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid configuration!\n", __func__);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Page/burst mode supports lengths of 4, 8 and 16 bytes */
>>>>> + if (p->burst_read || p->burst_write) {
>>>>> + switch (p->burst_len) {
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_4:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_8:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_16:
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid page/burst-length (%d)\n",
>>>>> + __func__, p->burst_len);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((p->wait_on_read || p->wait_on_write) &&
>>>>> + (p->wait_pin > gpmc_nr_waitpins)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid wait-pin (%d)\n", __func__, p->wait_pin);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + config1 = GPMC_CONFIG1_DEVICESIZE((p->device_width - 1));
>>>>
>>>> Can you consider read_modify approach?
>>>
>>> I was purposely trying to avoid that. The intent here is to program all
>>> the settings and get away from any boot-loader dependencies. If we use a
>>> read-modify approach then it will never be clear in the kernel what
>>> should actually be programmed.
>>
>> By the way, it would be good to know what your motivation for this is.
>>
>> My goal is for all gpmc settings to eventually live in the DT blob and
>> there be no dependency on the bootloader whatsoever. That may mean that
>> settings are re-programmed again by the kernel but IMO that is best.
>
> Yes I understood now and the right thing to do.
> Suggested read modify approach because of some confusion as GPMC_CONFIG1 is already
> modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() and is called from omap2_nand_gpmc_retime().
> So the data modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() will lost (not significant)
> May be better and cleaner solution is to remove GPMC_CONFIG1 modification in
> gpmc_cs_set_timings() also.
Actually that is a good point. There are some timings in CONFIG1 that
are not being configured in gpmc_cs_program_settings() but
gpmc_cs_set_timings(). I had left it this way intentionally to keep
timings together, which makes sense for where gpmc clock could change at
run time. However, this means that gpmc_cs_program_settings() needs to
be called before gpmc_cs_set_timings(). Really this is no different to
how the code was before, because the code was writing directly to
CONFIG1 and now we have a function.
So the intent is for gpmc_cs_program_settings() to only be called once
for a given device and then gpmc_cs_set_timings() be called whenever the
timings need to be updated. May be I can updated the kernel-doc for
gpmc_cs_program_settings() to reflect this. Let me know if you have any
other concerns with this.
Cheers
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 17:30 [PATCH 00/14] ARM: OMAP2+: GPMC clean-up and DT update Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Simplify code configuring ONENAND devices Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add variable to store number of GPMC waitpins Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add structure for storing GPMC settings Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function for configuring " Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 6:05 ` Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA8F007-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 17:12 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 5:33 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-03-01 15:43 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
[not found] ` <5130CCA9.10905-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-04 10:05 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert ONENAND to use gpmc_cs_program_settings() Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert NAND " Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1361899842-30303-7-git-send-email-jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-28 10:38 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-28 16:02 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 5:40 ` Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA90C46-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-01 15:50 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert SMC91x " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert TUSB " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Don't configure of chip-select options in gpmc_cs_configure() Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function to read GPMC settings from device-tree Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for NOR flash Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 21:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 22:24 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-04 11:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-04 17:51 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <5134DF2A.4050209-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-04 18:19 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 14:34 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 14:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 16:20 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 17:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-05 18:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 21:34 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 10:23 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 13:30 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 16:44 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:48 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 17:00 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 18:01 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-06 16:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-07 13:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add additional GPMC timing parameters Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1361899842-30303-13-git-send-email-jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-01 20:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 20:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert NAND to retrieve GPMC settings from DT Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert ONENAND " Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5130CCA9.10905@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox