[parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[joel.soete]

Hi all,

To verify my ioctl32 patch for 64bit kernel I am just trying to compile last cvs
kernel in 64bits on my b2000 (PA8600?). To do so, in make menu config, i choose
procesor type PA8x00, 64bits kernel && 32bits PDC (because b2000).

But when I launch make dep, it failled because it did not find hpp64-linux-gcc?
I search on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages but no success?

Do I have to report this problem to debian gcc package maintainer?
(IIRC for other paltform a compiler paramater avoid to have seperate bin)

Also to be sure to build it with Carlos tool chain, I had to specify
--target=hppa64-linux?

Thanks in advance for advice,
    Joel

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

Re: [parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 03:28:08PM +0200, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> To verify my ioctl32 patch for 64bit kernel I am just trying to compile last cvs
> kernel in 64bits on my b2000 (PA8600?). To do so, in make menu config, i choose
> procesor type PA8x00, 64bits kernel && 32bits PDC (because b2000).

what makes you think that you should use 32-bit PDC on b2000?

> But when I launch make dep, it failled because it did not find hpp64-linux-gcc?
> I search on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages but no success?

get the packages from ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/unofficial-debs.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: [parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[joel.soete]

Quoting Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>:

> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 03:28:08PM +0200, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> > To verify my ioctl32 patch for 64bit kernel I am just trying to
> compile last cvs
> > kernel in 64bits on my b2000 (PA8600?). To do so, in make menu config,
> i choose
> > procesor type PA8x00, 64bits kernel && 32bits PDC (because b2000).
> 
> what makes you think that you should use 32-bit PDC on b2000?

May I am wrong (I thought that the PDC of the b2000 was not a 64bits one; I will
check )

> 
> > But when I launch make dep, it failled because it did not find
> hpp64-linux-gcc?
> > I search on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages but no success?
> 
> get the packages from ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/unofficial-debs.

 
Many thanks for all,
    Joel


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)

Re: [parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 04:07:03PM +0200, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> May I am wrong (I thought that the PDC of the b2000 was not a 64bits one; I will
> check )

ah, you relied on memory rather than reading the help text then?

32-bit PDC
CONFIG_PDC_NARROW
  Saying Y here will allow developers with a C180, C200, C240, C360,
  J200, J210, and/or a J2240 to test 64-bit kernels by providing a
  wrapper for the 32-bit PDC calls.  Since the machines which require
  this option do not support over 4G of RAM, this option is targeted
  for developers of these machines wishing to test changes on both
  32-bit and 64-bit configurations.

  If unsure, say N.

b2000 and similar machines have firmware which supports both 32 and 64
bit PDC calls.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: [parisc-linux] hppa64-linux-gcc not in gcc dpkg?

[joel.soete]

Quoting Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>:

> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 04:07:03PM +0200, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> > May I am wrong (I thought that the PDC of the b2000 was not a 64bits
> one; I will
> > check )
> 
> ah, you relied on memory rather than reading the help text then?
> 
> 32-bit PDC
> CONFIG_PDC_NARROW
>   Saying Y here will allow developers with a C180, C200, C240, C360,
>   J200, J210, and/or a J2240 to test 64-bit kernels by providing a
>   wrapper for the 32-bit PDC calls.  Since the machines which require
>   this option do not support over 4G of RAM, this option is targeted
>   for developers of these machines wishing to test changes on both
>   32-bit and 64-bit configurations.
> 
>   If unsure, say N.
> 
> b2000 and similar machines have firmware which supports both 32 and 64
> bit PDC calls.
> 
Nice (for sure next time I will read help)
Thanks a lot,
    Joel



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)