Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] coherent ops and mb() revisited
Date: 05 Sep 2004 10:36:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094395005.1690.1.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409050627.i856RWW3027615@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 02:27, John David Anglin wrote:
> > I think the best implementation is probably
> > 
> > barrier();
> > a = __ldcw_align(x);
> 
> I don't understand why you put the barrier before the __ldcw_align
> operation.  The alignment operation is non-critical and could be done
> much earlier if that's desireable from a scheduling standpoint.

Actually, you're right.  I think all we need is the mb() after the
spin_lock code and another mb before the spin_unlock code.  How the
taking or releasing of the lock is optimised by gcc should be irrelevant
as long as it's locked when we cross the barrier.

James


_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-05 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-05  1:38 [parisc-linux] coherent ops and mb() revisited Grant Grundler
2004-09-05  2:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-05  6:27   ` John David Anglin
2004-09-05 14:36     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-09-06  4:19       ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-06  9:24         ` John David Anglin
2004-09-06 14:15         ` James Bottomley
2004-09-07 15:17           ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-07 15:30             ` James Bottomley
2004-09-08 16:52               ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-08 17:11                 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-10 16:11                   ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1094395005.1690.1.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox