* Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] justin
[not found] <199904210059.SAA10365@puffin.external.hp.com>
@ 1999-04-21 1:10 ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 1:21 ` Justin Maurer
1999-04-21 2:13 ` Alex deVries
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Shaver @ 1999-04-21 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
justin@puffin.external.hp.com wrote:
> puffin, is binutils-x-hppa ok?
binutils-x-parisc, no?
Mike
--
241391.11 234198.98
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] justin
1999-04-21 1:10 ` [parisc-linux-cvs] justin Mike Shaver
@ 1999-04-21 1:21 ` Justin Maurer
1999-04-21 1:22 ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 2:13 ` Alex deVries
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin Maurer @ 1999-04-21 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
> > puffin, is binutils-x-hppa ok?
>
> binutils-x-parisc, no?
oops :) yes, that is what i used. is it the proper label?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
# Justin Maurer GNOME Hacker #
# justin@debian.org Slashdot Author #
# http://slashdot.org/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer #
# 09 84 FC 03 13 AA 4A AF F6 A4 85 9D 8C 96 B6 A4 #
-------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] justin
1999-04-21 1:21 ` Justin Maurer
@ 1999-04-21 1:22 ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 2:14 ` Christopher Beard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Shaver @ 1999-04-21 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
Justin Maurer wrote:
>
> > > puffin, is binutils-x-hppa ok?
> >
> > binutils-x-parisc, no?
>
> oops :) yes, that is what i used. is it the proper label?
To the best of my meagre knowledge, yes.
Mike
--
242120.15 234824.91
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] justin
1999-04-21 1:10 ` [parisc-linux-cvs] justin Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 1:21 ` Justin Maurer
@ 1999-04-21 2:13 ` Alex deVries
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex deVries @ 1999-04-21 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Shaver; +Cc: parisc-linux
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Mike Shaver wrote:
> justin@puffin.external.hp.com wrote:
> > puffin, is binutils-x-hppa ok?
> binutils-x-parisc, no?
I'd say call it binutils-x-hppa-linux until we can actually have a target
called parisc-linux. I am just about done with those fixes to binutils,
though.
- Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] justin
1999-04-21 1:22 ` Mike Shaver
@ 1999-04-21 2:14 ` Christopher Beard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Beard @ 1999-04-21 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Shaver; +Cc: parisc-linux
> > > > puffin, is binutils-x-hppa ok?
> > >
> > > binutils-x-parisc, no?
> >
> > oops :) yes, that is what i used. is it the proper label?
>
> To the best of my meagre knowledge, yes.
I believe that's the story we're sticking to, for the moment. ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-04-21 2:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <199904210059.SAA10365@puffin.external.hp.com>
1999-04-21 1:10 ` [parisc-linux-cvs] justin Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 1:21 ` Justin Maurer
1999-04-21 1:22 ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-21 2:14 ` Christopher Beard
1999-04-21 2:13 ` Alex deVries
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox