* [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit
@ 2001-09-24 6:10 Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-09-29 0:09 ` Albert Strasheim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell Jr. @ 2001-09-24 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux; +Cc: Albert Strasheim
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 455 bytes --]
parisc,
Walking the source for devfs and thinking about Alberts problem.
Would the non-working devfs be fixed by adding:
Non-atomic versions of set_bit e.g. __set_bit
and test_and_set_bit e.g. __test_and_set_bit
to linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h?
I have the latest CVS linux module.
I've patched against that. It compiles now ;)
(god bless make -j8)
I'm currently sleepy, but I'll post the patch, and test
it tommorow on a 712/60 and 715/50.
c.
[-- Attachment #2: bitops-devfs.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1281 bytes --]
--- ./linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h.orig Mon Sep 24 01:27:31 2001
+++ ./linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h.mod Mon Sep 24 01:41:38 2001
@@ -50,6 +50,26 @@
SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE(ATOMIC_HASH(addr), flags);
}
+/*
+ * Non-Atomic __set_bit
+ *
+ * If called by multiple processes, only one will succeed.
+ * The others would have been reordered before the succeeding
+ * call.
+ *
+ */
+
+static __inline__ void __set_bit(int nr, void * address)
+{
+ unsigned long mask;
+ unsigned long *addr = (unsigned long *) address;
+
+ addr += (nr >> SHIFT_PER_LONG);
+ mask = 1L << CHOP_SHIFTCOUNT(nr);
+ *addr |= mask;
+}
+
+
static __inline__ int test_and_clear_bit(int nr, void * address)
{
unsigned long mask;
@@ -66,6 +86,25 @@
return oldbit;
}
+
+/*
+ * Non-Atomic __test_and_clear_bit
+ *
+ */
+
+static __inline__ int __test_and_clear_bit(int nr, void * address)
+{
+ unsigned long mask;
+ unsigned long *addr = (unsigned long *) address;
+ int oldbit;
+ addr += (nr >> SHIFT_PER_LONG);
+ mask = 1L << CHOP_SHIFTCOUNT(nr);
+ oldbit = (*addr & mask) ? 1 : 0;
+ *addr &= ~mask;
+ return oldbit;
+}
+
+
static __inline__ void clear_bit(int nr, void * address)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit
2001-09-24 6:10 [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit Carlos O'Donell Jr.
@ 2001-09-29 0:09 ` Albert Strasheim
2001-09-29 17:27 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Albert Strasheim @ 2001-09-29 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell Jr.; +Cc: parisc-linux
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 689 bytes --]
Hello,
Is this going into CVS any time soon? It seems to work fine on my
720/50.
Regards,
Albert
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Carlos O'Donell Jr. wrote:
> parisc,
>
> Walking the source for devfs and thinking about Alberts problem.
>
> Would the non-working devfs be fixed by adding:
>
> Non-atomic versions of set_bit e.g. __set_bit
> and test_and_set_bit e.g. __test_and_set_bit
> to linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h?
>
> I have the latest CVS linux module.
> I've patched against that. It compiles now ;)
> (god bless make -j8)
>
> I'm currently sleepy, but I'll post the patch, and test
> it tommorow on a 712/60 and 715/50.
>
> c.
<patch snipped>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit
2001-09-29 0:09 ` Albert Strasheim
@ 2001-09-29 17:27 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-09-29 21:43 ` Albert Strasheim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell Jr. @ 2001-09-29 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Albert Strasheim, parisc-linux
> Hello,
>
> Is this going into CVS any time soon? It seems to work fine on my
> 720/50.
>
> Regards,
>
> Albert
>
Albert,
Have you booted a devfs kernel on you box?
Does it seem to function properly?
Adding devfs to my kernel causes some odd stuff to go on after
trying to enter INIT. Though I haven't had time to sort it out.
The kernel boots fine, but probably one of the startup scripts
is doing something decidedly wrong.
Since you are using init=/bin/sh, and unless you tell devfs
to explicitly mount at boot, you won't _really_ be using
devfs :)
Sure, it compiles... and it looks like it should work.
But theory and practice are so different it's not funny.
<Carlos looks back at the RF Amplifier design he has on the
whiteboard and chuckles>
c.
>
> > parisc,
> >
> > Walking the source for devfs and thinking about Alberts problem.
> >
> > Would the non-working devfs be fixed by adding:
> >
> > Non-atomic versions of set_bit e.g. __set_bit
> > and test_and_set_bit e.g. __test_and_set_bit
> > to linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h?
> >
> > I have the latest CVS linux module.
> > I've patched against that. It compiles now ;)
> > (god bless make -j8)
> >
> > I'm currently sleepy, but I'll post the patch, and test
> > it tommorow on a 712/60 and 715/50.
> >
> > c.
>
> <patch snipped>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit
2001-09-29 17:27 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
@ 2001-09-29 21:43 ` Albert Strasheim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Albert Strasheim @ 2001-09-29 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell Jr.; +Cc: parisc-linux
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1795 bytes --]
Hello,
There's a CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT option that mounts it at boot. I know I
used fdisk on /dev/scsi/somedamnthing/part3/block10/orifice99 or
somesuch :-)
If init is croaking, you need devfsd perhaps?
But here it works fine.
Regards,
Albert
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Carlos O'Donell Jr. wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is this going into CVS any time soon? It seems to work fine on my
> > 720/50.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Albert
> >
>
> Albert,
>
> Have you booted a devfs kernel on you box?
> Does it seem to function properly?
>
> Adding devfs to my kernel causes some odd stuff to go on after
> trying to enter INIT. Though I haven't had time to sort it out.
> The kernel boots fine, but probably one of the startup scripts
> is doing something decidedly wrong.
>
> Since you are using init=/bin/sh, and unless you tell devfs
> to explicitly mount at boot, you won't _really_ be using
> devfs :)
>
> Sure, it compiles... and it looks like it should work.
> But theory and practice are so different it's not funny.
>
> <Carlos looks back at the RF Amplifier design he has on the
> whiteboard and chuckles>
>
> c.
>
> >
> > > parisc,
> > >
> > > Walking the source for devfs and thinking about Alberts problem.
> > >
> > > Would the non-working devfs be fixed by adding:
> > >
> > > Non-atomic versions of set_bit e.g. __set_bit
> > > and test_and_set_bit e.g. __test_and_set_bit
> > > to linux/include/asm-parisc/bitops.h?
> > >
> > > I have the latest CVS linux module.
> > > I've patched against that. It compiles now ;)
> > > (god bless make -j8)
> > >
> > > I'm currently sleepy, but I'll post the patch, and test
> > > it tommorow on a 712/60 and 715/50.
> > >
> > > c.
> >
> > <patch snipped>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-29 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-24 6:10 [parisc-linux] Non-atomic __set_bit Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-09-29 0:09 ` Albert Strasheim
2001-09-29 17:27 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-09-29 21:43 ` Albert Strasheim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox