[parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[jsoe0708]

Hi all,

Yesterday morning I do a cvs update of what I believe till last week being
gcc-3.1
(CVS/Tag == Tgcc-3-1-branch) but gcc/gcc/version.c shows me now 3.2 (well
the current development CVS being now 3.3)?

What do I wrong? (would I have to define the branch parameter each time I
do an update?)

Thanks in advance for advise,
    Joel

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:27:39AM +0200, jsoe0708@tiscali.be wrote:
> Yesterday morning I do a cvs update of what I believe till last week being
> gcc-3.1
> (CVS/Tag == Tgcc-3-1-branch) but gcc/gcc/version.c shows me now 3.2 (well
> the current development CVS being now 3.3)?

ah, you haven't been following the gcc mailing list.  due to a pressing
need to change the c++ ABI, the current 3.1 development tree has been
renamed to 3.2 and the erstwhile 3.2 development line has been renamed
to 3.3.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[John David Anglin]

> ah, you haven't been following the gcc mailing list.  due to a pressing
> need to change the c++ ABI, the current 3.1 development tree has been
> renamed to 3.2 and the erstwhile 3.2 development line has been renamed
> to 3.3.

3.1.1 has just been released.  3.2 will be released in the near future
and it will be identical to 3.1.1 except for the updates to the c++
ABI.  The 3.1 branch is now dead.  Regression fixing will continue
on the 3.2 branch after the first release.  The update to the 3.1
branch was made to accomodate the schedule of other projects (e.g.,
OpenOffice).  Since dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2, I doubt
this will affect hppa-linux much.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[Carlos O'Donell]

> 
> 3.1.1 has just been released.  3.2 will be released in the near future
> and it will be identical to 3.1.1 except for the updates to the c++
> ABI.  The 3.1 branch is now dead.  Regression fixing will continue
> on the 3.2 branch after the first release.  The update to the 3.1
> branch was made to accomodate the schedule of other projects (e.g.,
> OpenOffice).  Since dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2, I doubt
> this will affect hppa-linux much.
>

dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2 for hppa?
I'm confused, I believed that dwarf2 exception support wasn't
goin to be in 3.1, but surely in 3.2? 

Dave, please say this a typo :)

c.

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:20:41PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > 
> > 3.1.1 has just been released.  3.2 will be released in the near future
> > and it will be identical to 3.1.1 except for the updates to the c++
> > ABI.  The 3.1 branch is now dead.  Regression fixing will continue
> > on the 3.2 branch after the first release.  The update to the 3.1
> > branch was made to accomodate the schedule of other projects (e.g.,
> > OpenOffice).  Since dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2, I doubt
> > this will affect hppa-linux much.
> 
> dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2 for hppa?
> I'm confused, I believed that dwarf2 exception support wasn't
> goin to be in 3.1, but surely in 3.2? 

The renumbering has confused everyone (as I rather thought it might).
Old plan:	New:

3.1		3.1
3.1.1		3.1.1
3.1.2		3.2
3.2		3.3

So everything which used to read `this will be in gcc 3.2' should now read
`this will be in gcc 3.3'.  And everything which was `not in 3.1' is now
`not in 3.1 or 3.2 either'.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[John David Anglin]

> dwarf2 exception support isn't in 3.2 for hppa?
> I'm confused, I believed that dwarf2 exception support wasn't
> goin to be in 3.1, but surely in 3.2? 

It's not a typo.  What was 3.2 is now 3.3.  As was noted, 3.2
is going to be identical to 3.1.1 except for a c++ abi change.
3.2 should be out this week barring unforeseen problems.  The
3.1 branch has only been open for regression fixing for some
time now.

3.3 is scheduled to go into stage3 (bug fixing) on Aug. 15.
The 3.3 release is scheduled for Dec. 15.  The numbering change
hasn't affected the schedule for the next release from the
mainline.

Clear?

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)

Re: [parisc-linux] GCC CVS strange update?

[John David Anglin]

> 3.1.2		3.2

Although the 3.1 branch is nominally closed, it would seem possible
that somebody might want a release after 3.1.1 with the old c++ abi.
Thus, a new branch had to be created.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)