Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: willy@debian.org
Cc: grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com, jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com,
	parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: RFC: mmap patch
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 15:00:23 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030308.150023.97153009.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030308224503.L3865@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>

   From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
   Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:45:03 +0000
   
   The upshot is that if two addresses are congruent modulo 4MB and they
   map to the same physical address, the cache will detect it.  I've been
   thinking about (ab)using kmap() for this for a while.  The trouble
   is we'd need to have 1024 slots just to be guaranteed space to map 1
   page -- if we need to guarantee to be able to map two pages at once,
   we need 2048 slots (ie 8MB of virtual space).  Etc.  I have no idea how
   many pages we expect to be able to map simultaneously, and haven't been
   able to get a straight answer out of anyone so far.

You need merely 8MB of address space (2 * 4MB) if you implement
my {copy,clear}_user_page() dynamic mapping hack, that will be
tons more cheaper than any kmap based scheme and also be nicer
on the TLB as there will be zero TLB changes occurring around
the copy/clear.

People can continue to talk about all their bright new idea, which
is fine, but it feels like my known-working ideas are being ignored.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-08 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-06 14:14 [parisc-linux] Re: RFC: mmap patch John Marvin
2003-03-06 14:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-06 15:31   ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-08  6:30 ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08  6:29   ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 17:24     ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 19:04       ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 20:42         ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 22:45         ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-08 23:00           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-03-08 23:27             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-08 23:14               ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 23:31             ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-08 23:15               ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09  2:15             ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 23:11     ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-08 23:02       ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09 14:42         ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-09 21:38           ` David S. Miller
2003-03-10  1:50             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-10  5:18               ` David S. Miller
2003-03-14 13:04           ` Jochen Friedrich
2003-03-14 16:23             ` Grant Grundler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-09  3:42 John Marvin
2003-03-09 21:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09  3:51 John Marvin
2003-03-09 21:31 ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030308.150023.97153009.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com \
    --cc=jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox