From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: willy@debian.org, grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com,
jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: RFC: mmap patch
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:27:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030308232736.N3865@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030308.150023.97153009.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:00:23PM -0800
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:00:23PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> You need merely 8MB of address space (2 * 4MB) if you implement
> my {copy,clear}_user_page() dynamic mapping hack, that will be
> tons more cheaper than any kmap based scheme and also be nicer
> on the TLB as there will be zero TLB changes occurring around
> the copy/clear.
>
> People can continue to talk about all their bright new idea, which
> is fine, but it feels like my known-working ideas are being ignored.
Sorry, I think you've misunderstood the problem. This is write() vs mmap().
We call flush_dcache_page() after the write() -- but PA's flush_dcache_page() only flushes the kernel's mapping of that page, not the user's. The question is how to fix that.
Randolph published a patch which flushes two pages -- one which is the
kernel's view of the page, and one which is the user's view of the page.
John disagreed that was necessary, and I'm proposing a way (with kmap)
to avoid it.
Nothing to do with copy/clear_user_page().
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-08 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-06 14:14 [parisc-linux] Re: RFC: mmap patch John Marvin
2003-03-06 14:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-06 15:31 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-08 6:30 ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 6:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 17:24 ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 19:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 20:42 ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 22:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-08 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 23:27 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-03-08 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 23:31 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-08 23:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09 2:15 ` Grant Grundler
2003-03-08 23:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-08 23:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09 14:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-09 21:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-10 1:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-10 5:18 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-14 13:04 ` Jochen Friedrich
2003-03-14 16:23 ` Grant Grundler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-09 3:42 John Marvin
2003-03-09 21:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-09 3:51 John Marvin
2003-03-09 21:31 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030308232736.N3865@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com \
--cc=jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox