Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: "Michael S. Zick" <mszick@goquest.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
	Joel Soete <jsoe0708@tiscali.be>,
	parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 23:06:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030316230611.GS29631@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03031616521900.01171@wolf466>

On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:52:19PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Friday 14 March 2003 07:17 am, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > net/core/rtnetlink.c:extern __inline__ int rtnetlink_rcv_skb(struct sk_buff
> > *skb)
> Stolen from the GCC thread on 3.x.x inlining...
> - - - - GCC - - - - -
> For the record, the kernel doesn't need this any more.  Go check 2.5;
> new versions of <linux/compiler.h> contain this line:
> #define inline          __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
> - - - - - - - - - - - -
> That forces GCC to ignore its changed inline metrics and simply inline
> the function.

Yes, but...

 * Joel's using 2.4, not 2.5
 * #define inline doesn't help functions which are marked as __inline__

This isn't a function which absolutely needs to be inlined.  It can
be `static inline' and gcc can do whatever it likes then.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-16 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <15968.40812.741982.606734@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
     [not found] ` <15969.1828.456001.122737@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2003-03-02  4:59   ` [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa Randolph Chung
2003-03-02  4:59   ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02  5:40     ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02  9:24       ` M. Grabert
2003-03-02  9:24       ` M. Grabert
2003-03-02 17:01         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 17:01         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 18:50         ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02 18:50         ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02  5:40     ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 14:27     ` Joel Soete
2003-03-03 16:17       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 16:24         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-03 17:22           ` Joel Soete
2003-03-03 16:17       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 14:27     ` Joel Soete
2003-03-09 20:06     ` Matthias Klose
2003-03-09 20:27       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-09 20:27       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-09 20:45         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-09 20:45         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-09 20:06     ` Matthias Klose
2003-03-12 17:33     ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:35       ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-12 17:35       ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-12 17:53         ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 12:48           ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 12:48           ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 13:17             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-14 16:31               ` Joel Soete
2003-03-18 18:14                 ` b.gunreben
2003-03-18 18:53                   ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 19:02                     ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 19:02                     ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 19:16                       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 19:16                       ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 20:21                         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 20:21                         ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 20:55                           ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 20:55                           ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 17:51                             ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 17:51                             ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:13                               ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 18:23                                 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 18:23                                 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-21 12:44                                   ` Joel Soete
2003-03-21 13:36                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-21 15:07                                       ` Joel Soete
2003-03-21 12:44                                   ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:13                               ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 21:59                     ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 21:59                     ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 18:53                   ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 18:14                 ` b.gunreben
2003-03-14 16:31               ` Joel Soete
2003-03-16 22:52               ` Michael S.Zick
2003-03-16 23:06                 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-03-16 23:17                   ` Michael S.Zick
2003-03-20 18:20                     ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 13:17             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-20 18:06           ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:06           ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:53         ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:33     ` Joel Soete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030316230611.GS29631@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=willy@debian.org \
    --cc=jsoe0708@tiscali.be \
    --cc=mszick@goquest.com \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox