From: "Joel Soete" <jsoe0708@tiscali.be>
To: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>, dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
Cc: tausq@debian.org, b.gunreben@web.de, willy@debian.org,
doko@cs.tu-berlin.de, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:44:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E689FC400004CD8@ocpmta1.freegates.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303201823.h2KINN1w007420@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8303 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
>
>Sorry, that part is wrong. Anyway, just leave the macro defines as
>is and cast them where used to void *. This causes the conversion
>of the other operand to void * and function pointer conicalization
>won't be done (6.5.9, paragraph 5).
>
you have definitely right.
I test following work-around against 2.4.20-pa32 with latest dpkg gcc-3.3
(3.3-0pre2) and it boot well know:
=====
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/Makefile linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/Makefile
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/Makefile 2003-03-21 12:17:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/Makefile 2003-03-21 12:19:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 4
SUBLEVEL = 20
-EXTRAVERSION = -pa32
+EXTRAVERSION = -pa33
KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 10:54:23.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 12:39:20.000000000
+0100
@@ -489,7 +489,11 @@
ka = ¤t->sig->action[signr-1];
DBG(("sa_handler is %x\n",
(unsigned int) ka->sa.sa_handler));
+#if !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__
>= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN) {
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) {
+#endif
if (signr != SIGCHLD)
continue;
while (sys_wait4(-1, NULL, WNOHANG, NULL) > 0)
@@ -497,7 +501,11 @@
continue;
}
+#if !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__
>= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL) {
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL) {
+#endif
int exit_code = signr;
/* Init gets no signals it doesn't want. */
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/drivers/char/n_tty.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/drivers/char/n_tty.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/drivers/char/n_tty.c 2003-03-21 10:51:30.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/drivers/char/n_tty.c 2003-03-21 12:34:35.000000000
+0100
@@ -810,7 +810,11 @@
int is_ignored(int sig)
{
return (sigismember(¤t->blocked, sig) ||
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ current->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN);
+#else
current->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN);
+#endif
}
static void n_tty_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, struct termios * old)
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/ncpfs/sock.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/ncpfs/sock.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2003-03-21 10:36:05.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2003-03-21 12:35:37.000000000
+0100
@@ -466,9 +466,17 @@
What if we've blocked it ourselves? What about
alarms? Why, in fact, are we mucking with the
sigmask at all? -- r~ */
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (current->sig->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (current->sig->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
mask |= sigmask(SIGINT);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (current->sig->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (current->sig->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
mask |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
}
siginitsetinv(¤t->blocked, mask);
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/proc/array.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/proc/array.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/proc/array.c 2003-03-21 10:01:18.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/proc/array.c 2003-03-21 12:36:44.000000000
+0100
@@ -231,9 +231,17 @@
if (p->sig) {
k = p->sig->action;
for (i = 1; i <= _NSIG; ++i, ++k) {
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+#endif
sigaddset(ign, i);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ else if (k->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
else if (k->sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigaddset(catch, i);
}
}
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/include/linux/compiler.h linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/include/linux/compiler.h
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/include/linux/compiler.h 2003-03-21 12:31:39.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/include/linux/compiler.h 2003-03-21 12:32:07.000000000
+0100
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
#ifndef __LINUX_COMPILER_H
#define __LINUX_COMPILER_H
+#if (__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1)
+#define inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#define __inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#endif
+
/* Somewhere in the middle of the GCC 2.96 development cycle, we implemented
a mechanism by which the user can annotate likely branch directions and
expect the blocks to be reordered appropriately. Define __builtin_expect
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/kernel/signal.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 10:39:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 12:37:40.000000000
+0100
@@ -126,7 +126,11 @@
int i;
struct k_sigaction *ka = &t->sig->action[0];
for (i = _NSIG ; i != 0 ; i--) {
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN)
+#endif
ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
ka->sa.sa_flags = 0;
sigemptyset(&ka->sa.sa_mask);
@@ -572,7 +576,11 @@
return -ESRCH;
}
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+#endif
t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
sigdelset(&t->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending(t);
@@ -1094,8 +1102,13 @@
* the signal to be ignored.
*/
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN
+ || (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL
+#else
if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN
|| (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL
+#endif
&& (sig == SIGCONT ||
sig == SIGCHLD ||
sig == SIGURG ||
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/net/sunrpc/clnt.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/net/sunrpc/clnt.c 2003-03-21 10:46:28.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/net/sunrpc/clnt.c 2003-03-21 12:38:07.000000000
+0100
@@ -209,9 +209,17 @@
/* Turn off various signals */
if (clnt->cl_intr) {
struct k_sigaction *action = current->sig->action;
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigallow |= sigmask(SIGINT);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__
== 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigallow |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sigmask_lock, irqflags);
=====
I could not be sure about __LP64__ condition because gcc-hppa62_3.3 do not
yet exist :(
Can some body else could test it more?
Joel
PS1: I hoppe it will stay just a temporary work-around; that is typical what
I hate: code depending of platform and more over compiler release :(
PS2: If I well understand the pa32 patch include the Alan patch concerning
ptrace vulnerability. Is there some simple mean to stress the solution on
hppa platform?
---------------------------------
Vous surfez avec une ligne classique ?
Economisez jusqu'à 25% avec Tiscali Complete !
Offre spéciale : première année d'abonnement offerte.
... Plus d'info sur http://complete.tiscali.be
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.4.20-pa32_gcc33.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 7228 bytes --]
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/Makefile linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/Makefile
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/Makefile 2003-03-21 12:17:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/Makefile 2003-03-21 12:19:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 4
SUBLEVEL = 20
-EXTRAVERSION = -pa32
+EXTRAVERSION = -pa33
KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 10:54:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 12:39:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -489,7 +489,11 @@
ka = ¤t->sig->action[signr-1];
DBG(("sa_handler is %x\n",
(unsigned int) ka->sa.sa_handler));
+#if !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN) {
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) {
+#endif
if (signr != SIGCHLD)
continue;
while (sys_wait4(-1, NULL, WNOHANG, NULL) > 0)
@@ -497,7 +501,11 @@
continue;
}
+#if !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL) {
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL) {
+#endif
int exit_code = signr;
/* Init gets no signals it doesn't want. */
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/drivers/char/n_tty.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/drivers/char/n_tty.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/drivers/char/n_tty.c 2003-03-21 10:51:30.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/drivers/char/n_tty.c 2003-03-21 12:34:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -810,7 +810,11 @@
int is_ignored(int sig)
{
return (sigismember(¤t->blocked, sig) ||
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ current->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN);
+#else
current->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN);
+#endif
}
static void n_tty_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, struct termios * old)
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/ncpfs/sock.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/ncpfs/sock.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2003-03-21 10:36:05.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/ncpfs/sock.c 2003-03-21 12:35:37.000000000 +0100
@@ -466,9 +466,17 @@
What if we've blocked it ourselves? What about
alarms? Why, in fact, are we mucking with the
sigmask at all? -- r~ */
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (current->sig->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (current->sig->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
mask |= sigmask(SIGINT);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (current->sig->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (current->sig->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
mask |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
}
siginitsetinv(¤t->blocked, mask);
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/proc/array.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/proc/array.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/fs/proc/array.c 2003-03-21 10:01:18.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/fs/proc/array.c 2003-03-21 12:36:44.000000000 +0100
@@ -231,9 +231,17 @@
if (p->sig) {
k = p->sig->action;
for (i = 1; i <= _NSIG; ++i, ++k) {
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+#endif
sigaddset(ign, i);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ else if (k->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
else if (k->sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigaddset(catch, i);
}
}
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/include/linux/compiler.h linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/include/linux/compiler.h
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/include/linux/compiler.h 2003-03-21 12:31:39.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/include/linux/compiler.h 2003-03-21 12:32:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
#ifndef __LINUX_COMPILER_H
#define __LINUX_COMPILER_H
+#if (__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1)
+#define inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#define __inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
+#endif
+
/* Somewhere in the middle of the GCC 2.96 development cycle, we implemented
a mechanism by which the user can annotate likely branch directions and
expect the blocks to be reordered appropriately. Define __builtin_expect
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/kernel/signal.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 10:39:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/kernel/signal.c 2003-03-21 12:37:40.000000000 +0100
@@ -126,7 +126,11 @@
int i;
struct k_sigaction *ka = &t->sig->action[0];
for (i = _NSIG ; i != 0 ; i--) {
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (ka->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN)
+#endif
ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
ka->sa.sa_flags = 0;
sigemptyset(&ka->sa.sa_mask);
@@ -572,7 +576,11 @@
return -ESRCH;
}
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
+#else
if (t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+#endif
t->sig->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
sigdelset(&t->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending(t);
@@ -1094,8 +1102,13 @@
* the signal to be ignored.
*/
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN
+ || (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL
+#else
if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN
|| (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL
+#endif
&& (sig == SIGCONT ||
sig == SIGCHLD ||
sig == SIGURG ||
diff -Naur linux-2.4.20-pa32/net/sunrpc/clnt.c linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pa32/net/sunrpc/clnt.c 2003-03-21 10:46:28.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-pa32-gcc33/net/sunrpc/clnt.c 2003-03-21 12:38:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -209,9 +209,17 @@
/* Turn off various signals */
if (clnt->cl_intr) {
struct k_sigaction *action = current->sig->action;
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigallow |= sigmask(SIGINT);
+#if defined (__hppa__) && !defined (__LP64__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1))
+ if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
+#else
if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+#endif
sigallow |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sigmask_lock, irqflags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <15968.40812.741982.606734@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
[not found] ` <15969.1828.456001.122737@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2003-03-02 4:59 ` [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 5:40 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02 9:24 ` M. Grabert
2003-03-02 17:01 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 17:01 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-02 18:50 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02 18:50 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-02 9:24 ` M. Grabert
2003-03-02 5:40 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 14:27 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-03 16:17 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 16:24 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-03 17:22 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-03 16:17 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-03 14:27 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-09 20:06 ` Matthias Klose
2003-03-09 20:27 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-09 20:45 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-09 20:45 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-09 20:27 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-09 20:06 ` Matthias Klose
2003-03-12 17:33 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:35 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-12 17:35 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-12 17:53 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 12:48 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-14 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-14 16:31 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 16:31 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-18 18:14 ` b.gunreben
2003-03-18 18:53 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 18:53 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 19:02 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 19:16 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 20:21 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 20:55 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 17:51 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:13 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 18:13 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 18:23 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-20 18:23 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-21 12:44 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-21 12:44 ` Joel Soete [this message]
2003-03-21 13:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-21 15:07 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 17:51 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-18 20:55 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 20:21 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 19:16 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 19:02 ` Randolph Chung
2003-03-18 21:59 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 21:59 ` John David Anglin
2003-03-18 18:14 ` b.gunreben
2003-03-16 22:52 ` Michael S.Zick
2003-03-16 23:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-16 23:17 ` Michael S.Zick
2003-03-20 18:20 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-14 12:48 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:06 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-20 18:06 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:53 ` Joel Soete
2003-03-12 17:33 ` Joel Soete
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E689FC400004CD8@ocpmta1.freegates.net \
--to=jsoe0708@tiscali.be \
--cc=b.gunreben@web.de \
--cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=debian-hppa@lists.debian.org \
--cc=doko@cs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=tausq@debian.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox