From: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>,
Carlo Pisani <carlojpisani@gmail.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] parisc: Fix crash due alternative coding for NP iopdir_fdc bit
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:59:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530205955.GD683@t470p.stackframe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530195543.GB683@t470p.stackframe.org>
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:55:43PM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:15:03PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > >> Exactly. And as:
> > >>
> > >> a) All C3600 PDC versions clear the NP bit
> > >> b) All C37XX/J5000 PDC version set the NP bit
> > >>
> > >> i don't think there's some bug in the PDC. I would guess that the patch Carlo
> > >> reported to fix issues is just hiding the real problem. Would be interesting
> > >> to run Carlo's Test on a C37XX.
> > >
> > > Probably, hardware cache coherent I/O is not implemented correctly for Elroy based systems.
> > > https://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/96feb/feb96a6.pdf
> > > Does it work on C360?
> >
> > I slowly start to get confused...
> > Just thinking about another possibility: Maybe we can rely on the value of the
> > NP iopdir_fdc bit only on machines with >= PA8700 CPUs?
> > For older machines (which would need opdir_fdc) HP-UX or other operating
> > systems decides on the found CPU.
> > This would explain why it's not set on Carlo's C3600, and if Sven's C240
> > (with a PA8200 CPU) doesn't has the bit set too, then this could explain this theory.
>
> I just re-tested my kexec branch, and the HPMC i was seeing when kexec'ing a new
> kernel on my J5000 is now gone with Helge's patch. J5000 also has PCX-W. It was
> only triggered when i had SMP enabled, but this is somehow not suprising given
> the fact that a cache flush was missing.
Looks like i'm also confused now. My J5000 crashed with the kexec stuff again.
It's much less than before, only 1 out of 10 times.
The patch does:
if ((cond & ALT_COND_NO_IOC_FDC) &&
((boot_cpu_data.cpu_type < pcxw) ||
(boot_cpu_data.cpu_type == pcxw_) ||
(boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_IOPDIR_FDC)))
continue;
So there should be no change for PCX-W and my statement that this fixes anything
on my J5000 is wrong. I think i'll disable the patching and see whether the problem
disappears.
Regards
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-27 19:20 [PATCH v3] parisc: Fix crash due alternative coding for NP iopdir_fdc bit Helge Deller
2019-05-27 19:35 ` Carlo Pisani
2019-05-27 20:13 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:22 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-27 20:49 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:15 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 11:06 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 11:28 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-05-28 15:41 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 15:52 ` Helge Deller
[not found] ` <e81b7ae4-3126-5fda-58e4-4a83bd4fcfcf@bell.net>
2019-05-28 15:11 ` Helge Deller
2019-05-28 15:38 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 17:06 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-28 17:24 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-05-28 17:39 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 18:40 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-29 14:15 ` Helge Deller
2019-05-29 17:01 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-30 19:55 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-30 20:59 ` Sven Schnelle [this message]
2019-05-31 12:23 ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 10:29 ` Carlo Pisani
2019-06-02 14:45 ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 14:38 ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 16:12 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 19:41 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:11 ` Helge Deller
2019-05-27 20:16 ` Carlo Pisani
2019-05-27 20:45 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190530205955.GD683@t470p.stackframe.org \
--to=svens@stackframe.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=carlojpisani@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox