Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
	Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>,
	Carlo Pisani <carlojpisani@gmail.com>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] parisc: Fix crash due alternative coding for NP iopdir_fdc bit
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:59:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530205955.GD683@t470p.stackframe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530195543.GB683@t470p.stackframe.org>

Hi,

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:55:43PM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:15:03PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > >> Exactly. And as:
> > >>
> > >> a) All C3600 PDC versions clear the NP bit
> > >> b) All C37XX/J5000 PDC version set the NP bit
> > >>
> > >> i don't think there's some bug in the PDC. I would guess that the patch Carlo
> > >> reported to fix issues is just hiding the real problem. Would be interesting
> > >> to run Carlo's Test on a C37XX.
> > >
> > > Probably, hardware cache coherent I/O is not implemented correctly for Elroy based systems.
> > > https://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/96feb/feb96a6.pdf
> > > Does it work on C360?
> > 
> > I slowly start to get confused...
> > Just thinking about another possibility: Maybe we can rely on the value of the
> > NP iopdir_fdc bit only on machines with >= PA8700 CPUs?
> > For older machines (which would need opdir_fdc) HP-UX or other operating
> > systems decides on the found CPU.
> > This would explain why it's not  set on Carlo's C3600, and if Sven's C240
> > (with a PA8200 CPU) doesn't has the bit set too, then this could explain this theory.
> 
> I just re-tested my kexec branch, and the HPMC i was seeing when kexec'ing a new
> kernel on my J5000 is now gone with Helge's patch. J5000 also has PCX-W. It was
> only triggered when i had SMP enabled, but this is somehow not suprising given
> the fact that a cache flush was missing.

Looks like i'm also confused now. My J5000 crashed with the kexec stuff again.
It's much less than before, only 1 out of 10 times.

The patch does:

                if ((cond & ALT_COND_NO_IOC_FDC) &&
                       ((boot_cpu_data.cpu_type < pcxw) ||
                        (boot_cpu_data.cpu_type == pcxw_) ||
                        (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_IOPDIR_FDC)))
                        continue;

So there should be no change for PCX-W and my statement that this fixes anything
on my J5000 is wrong. I think i'll disable the patching and see whether the problem
disappears.

Regards
Sven

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-30 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 19:20 [PATCH v3] parisc: Fix crash due alternative coding for NP iopdir_fdc bit Helge Deller
2019-05-27 19:35 ` Carlo Pisani
2019-05-27 20:13   ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:22     ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-27 20:49       ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:15   ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 11:06     ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 11:28       ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-05-28 15:41         ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 15:52           ` Helge Deller
     [not found]       ` <e81b7ae4-3126-5fda-58e4-4a83bd4fcfcf@bell.net>
2019-05-28 15:11         ` Helge Deller
2019-05-28 15:38           ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 17:06             ` John David Anglin
2019-05-28 17:24               ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-05-28 17:39                 ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-28 18:40                   ` John David Anglin
2019-05-29 14:15                     ` Helge Deller
2019-05-29 17:01                       ` John David Anglin
2019-05-30 19:55                       ` Sven Schnelle
2019-05-30 20:59                         ` Sven Schnelle [this message]
2019-05-31 12:23                           ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 10:29                             ` Carlo Pisani
2019-06-02 14:45                               ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 14:38                             ` John David Anglin
2019-06-02 16:12                               ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 19:41 ` John David Anglin
2019-05-27 20:11   ` Helge Deller
2019-05-27 20:16     ` Carlo Pisani
2019-05-27 20:45     ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190530205955.GD683@t470p.stackframe.org \
    --to=svens@stackframe.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=carlojpisani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox