From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Guy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make EWOULDBLOCK be equal to EAGAIN on parisc.
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 22:15:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D84BF5.3010001@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2sS1hO=do8VTwn-_mPwZge_AdunrOfoC0VW4RnezaDfZYxXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/16/2014 10:05 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:49 PM, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net> wrote:
>>> This is an ABI break.
>>>
>>> You can't do this without rebuilding userspace.
>>>
>>> You need debian an gentoo onboard to do this ABI break.
>>
>> This would take about a month on Debian, so I'm against. Various bits of kernel code traditionally
>> return EWOULDBLOCK, so any application code that just checks EWOULDBLOCK would fail.
>
> That's not true if, like all other targets, EWOULDBLOCK == AGAIN. It's
> only true on hppa, and that's the problem.
>
> The kernel is completely inconsistent about returning EWOULDBLOCK or
> EAGAIN, and the standards do dictate one or the other so the kernel
> and glibc are correct to use one or the other to match the standard.
>
> However, user applications are equally sloppy about checking the right value.
Guy, do you have actual programs which are currently broken and which don't check for both?
My feeling is, that most programs were fixed, but I might be wrong...
Helge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 16:17 [PATCH] Make EWOULDBLOCK be equal to EAGAIN on parisc Guy Martin
2014-01-16 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-01-16 20:49 ` John David Anglin
2014-01-16 21:05 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-01-16 21:15 ` Helge Deller [this message]
2014-01-16 22:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-17 8:55 ` Guy Martin
2014-01-17 14:01 ` John David Anglin
2014-01-17 14:08 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-01-17 15:11 ` Guy Martin
2014-01-17 22:27 ` Helge Deller
2014-01-31 16:53 ` Helge Deller
2014-01-31 17:24 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-01-31 23:16 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D84BF5.3010001@gmx.de \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=gmsoft@tuxicoman.be \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox