From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broken Domain Validation in 6.1.84+
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:06:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb06622e6add6309e8dbb9a8944d53d1b9c4aaa.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf78b204-9149-4462-8e82-b8f98859004b@bell.net>
On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 10:30 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2024-04-05 3:36 p.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 4/4/24 13:07, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > On 2024-04-04 12:32 p.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > Can you please help with verifying whether this kernel warning
> > > > is only
> > > > triggered by the 6.1 stable kernel series or whether it is also
> > > > triggered by a vanilla kernel, e.g. kernel v6.8? That will tell
> > > > us
> > > > whether we need to review the upstream changes or the backports
> > > > on the v6.1 branch.
> > >
> > > Stable kernel v6.8.3 is okay.
> >
> > Would it be possible to bisect this issue on the linux-6.1.y
> > branch? That probably will be faster than reviewing all backports
> > of SCSI patches on that branch.
> The warning triggers with v6.1.81. It doesn't trigger with v6.1.80.
It's this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-6.1.y&id=cf33e6ca12d814e1be2263cb76960d0019d7fb94
The specific problem being that the update to scsi_execute doesn't set
the sense_len that the WARN_ON is checking.
This isn't a problem in mainline because we've converted all uses of
scsi_execute. Stable needs to either complete the conversion or back
out the inital patch.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-06 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 16:20 Broken Domain Validation in 6.1.84+ John David Anglin
2024-04-04 16:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-04-04 20:07 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-05 19:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-04-06 14:30 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-06 15:06 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2024-04-06 16:16 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-06 18:51 ` James Bottomley
2024-04-07 6:16 ` Greg KH
2024-04-07 13:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-04-08 0:58 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-08 13:46 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-04-08 14:17 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-08 14:32 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-04-08 15:17 ` John David Anglin
2024-04-08 17:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-04-11 4:40 ` Cyril Brulebois
2024-04-11 7:29 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cb06622e6add6309e8dbb9a8944d53d1b9c4aaa.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox