Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()

["Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 8/4/26 14:42, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> > > > > From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> > > > >
> > > > > Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical.
> > > >
> > > > You sure do like succinct commit messages :)
> > >
> > > I didn't even write this one! See the From: :))
> >
> > Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;)
>
> Noted :-)
>
> > > > Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG and
> > > > ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h which are
> > > > functionally identical.
>
> Isn't that basically the same as:
> "Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical."
> ;-)

I am being _exceedingly_, possibly outrageously pedantic here :>)

>
> > > I can touch it up though, if you insist.
> >
> > Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but be nice
> > if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :)
>
> Yes, I'm fine with any cleanup/rephrasing of the commit message.

Thanks :)

> Thanks!
> Helge
>
> > > > (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the
> > > > ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessary
> > > > indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.)

--
Cheers, Lorenzo