From: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@oracle.com>
To: Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@google.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Ben Fuller" <ben.fuller@oracle.com>,
"Drew Walton" <drewwalton@microsoft.com>,
"Anil Agrawal" <anilagrawal@meta.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI/AER: Add AER sysfs attributes for log ratelimits
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:10:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <037da68f-791a-4f04-a39c-0fde3dac5704@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMC_AXUZDTWeF77Zog1tTXZ2FMKmk3-cVEbc1PaWnfF3zgGQuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/03/2025 01:58, Jon Pan-Doh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 12:31 AM Karolina Stolarek
> <karolina.stolarek@oracle.com> wrote:
>> In my opinion, we want them to be separate. We may want to see no logs
>> of errors but still have them recorded in rasdaemon, for example.
>
> Understood. So the sysfs toggles could be something like:
>
> aer/ratelimit_log_enable
> aer/ratelimit_irq_enable (with default = off)
>
> This assumes that IRQ ratelimiting part is able to be merged.
Sounds good to me
> FYI, the current implementation ratelimits for both logs and trace
> events, but increments AER counters. If there's a scenario where you'd
> want no logs but have trace events sent, then we may need another
> ratelimit and/or roll that into IRQ ratelimiting (to avoid trace
> buffer/userspace agent getting inundated with events). Granted, there
> is probably a higher tolerance for spam there than in console logs.
Right, I see what you mean. I think we would like to still trace them,
at least that's what I got from the conversation I had with Jonathan[1].
It would be good to agree on the final solution here.
All the best,
Karolina
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241216104424.00000fab@huawei.com/
>
> If that's desirable, maybe it could be a follow-up as well? I figure
> this series is at least a good first step to handle any spam (vs.
> status quo).
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 2:35 [PATCH v2 0/8] Rate limit AER logs Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove aer_print_port_info Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-04 18:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-05 1:04 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-05 22:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-06 1:32 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-07 0:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI/AER: Use the same log level for all messages Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:25 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 2:48 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:26 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-28 22:25 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-04 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-07 12:04 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-03-13 21:15 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] PCI/AER: Move AER stat collection out of __aer_print_error Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 2:48 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:26 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI/AER: Rename struct aer_stats to aer_report Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 2:49 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] PCI/AER: Introduce ratelimit for error logs Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 2:49 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] PCI/AER: Add ratelimits to PCI AER Documentation Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:30 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI/AER: Add AER sysfs attributes for log ratelimits Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 13:31 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 2:50 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:28 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19 5:42 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-25 13:56 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-28 22:28 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-03 8:31 ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-03-04 0:58 ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-07 12:10 ` Karolina Stolarek [this message]
2025-03-07 19:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] PCI/AER: Update AER sysfs ABI filename Jon Pan-Doh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=037da68f-791a-4f04-a39c-0fde3dac5704@oracle.com \
--to=karolina.stolarek@oracle.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=anilagrawal@meta.com \
--cc=ben.fuller@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=drewwalton@microsoft.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pandoh@google.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox