Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@google.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Karolina Stolarek" <karolina.stolarek@oracle.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"Ben Fuller" <ben.fuller@oracle.com>,
	"Drew Walton" <drewwalton@microsoft.com>,
	"Anil Agrawal" <anilagrawal@meta.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy"
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove aer_print_port_info
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:35:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305223540.GA312467@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMC_AXUqLYb=qr+EW0WeKq-NW7wQwNNi14Kc5k-6XmtXNiC18w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 05:04:21PM -0800, Jon Pan-Doh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:32 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > It's true this is redundant information, but that e1000e device may
> > no longer be accessible.
> >
> > In that case, I think aer_get_device_error_info() would probably
> > return 0 because config reads would all return ~0, and
> > PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS & ~PCI_ERR_COR_MASK would be 0, so
> > we probably wouldn't see the e1000e messages at all.
> 
> Wouldn't we have larger issues if the device is no longer accessible?
> Would a log suffice in that case (i.e. when aer_get_device_error()
> returns 0)? Something along the lines of "{device} is not accessible
> while processing (un)correctable error"

It's quite likely that a device is inaccessible after an uncorrectable
error.

DPC takes the link down automatically for uncorrectable errors, but I
don't think aer_print_port_info() is used in that case anyway.

Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst mentions other cases where
the affected device is disconnected.

If the purpose of this patch is only to turn this:

  pcieport 0000:00:04.0: Correctable error message received from 0000:01:00.0
  e1000e 0000:01:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link
Layer, (Receiver ID)
  e1000e 0000:01:00.0:   device [8086:10d3] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
  e1000e 0000:01:00.0:    [ 6] BadTLP

into this:

  e1000e 0000:01:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link
Layer, (Receiver ID)
  e1000e 0000:01:00.0:   device [8086:10d3] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
  e1000e 0000:01:00.0:    [ 6] BadTLP

I don't think it's worth it.

I guess the problem is that future patches rate limit the e1000e
messages, and we really need to rate limit the pcieport message using
the same e1000e ratelimit_state.  We do know the Requester ID of the
device, so maybe we could look up that ratelimit_state?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  2:35 [PATCH v2 0/8] Rate limit AER logs Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove aer_print_port_info Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-04 18:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-05  1:04     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-05 22:35       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-03-06  1:32         ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-07  0:02           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI/AER: Use the same log level for all messages Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:25   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  2:48     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:26       ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-28 22:25         ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-04 18:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-07 12:04     ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-03-13 21:15       ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] PCI/AER: Move AER stat collection out of __aer_print_error Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  2:48     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:26       ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI/AER: Rename struct aer_stats to aer_report Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  2:49     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] PCI/AER: Introduce ratelimit for error logs Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:29   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  2:49     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] PCI/AER: Add ratelimits to PCI AER Documentation Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 11:30   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI/AER: Add AER sysfs attributes for log ratelimits Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-17 13:31   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  2:50     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-24 11:28       ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-19  5:42     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-02-25 13:56   ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-02-28 22:28     ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-03  8:31       ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-03-04  0:58         ` Jon Pan-Doh
2025-03-07 12:10           ` Karolina Stolarek
2025-03-07 19:41             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] PCI/AER: Update AER sysfs ABI filename Jon Pan-Doh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250305223540.GA312467@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=anilagrawal@meta.com \
    --cc=ben.fuller@oracle.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=drewwalton@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=karolina.stolarek@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=pandoh@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox