Re: [PATCH] PCI hotplug: shpchp: don't blindly claim non-AMD 0x7450 device IDs

Re: [PATCH] PCI hotplug: shpchp: don't blindly claim non-AMD 0x7450 device IDs

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:16:43 -0600
> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Previously we claimed device ID 0x7450, regardless of the vendor, which is
>> clearly wrong.  Now we'll claim that device ID only for AMD.
>>
>> I suspect this was just a typo in the original code, but it's possible this
>> change will break shpchp on non-7450 AMD bridges.  If so, we'll have to fix
>> them as we find them.
>
> Applied to my for-linus branch, thanks.

Jesse, I think this one got lost (at least, I don't see it in the
current upstream tree).

Bjorn

Re: [PATCH] PCI hotplug: shpchp: don't blindly claim non-AMD 0x7450 device IDs

[Jesse Barnes]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 923 bytes --]

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:37:14 -0700
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:16:43 -0600
> > Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Previously we claimed device ID 0x7450, regardless of the vendor, which is
> >> clearly wrong.  Now we'll claim that device ID only for AMD.
> >>
> >> I suspect this was just a typo in the original code, but it's possible this
> >> change will break shpchp on non-7450 AMD bridges.  If so, we'll have to fix
> >> them as we find them.
> >
> > Applied to my for-linus branch, thanks.
> 
> Jesse, I think this one got lost (at least, I don't see it in the
> current upstream tree).

Thanks for checking; looks like it got lost in my kernel.org transition
somehow.  Queued to for-linus now.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]