Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] PCI/ACPI: Split _OSC "support" and "control" flags into separate variables
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:14:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906171436.11482.21353.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906171010.11482.34235.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop>

Previously we used "flags" for both:

  - the bitmask of features we support (segments, ASPM, MSI, etc.), and
  - the bitmask of features we want to control (native hotplug, AER, etc.)

To reduce confusion, this patch splits this into two variables:
"support" is the bitmask of features we support, and "control" is the
bitmask of features we want to control.  No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 3e57f10..3e06d4e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
 static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 				 int *clear_aspm)
 {
-	u32 flags, base_flags;
+	u32 support, base_support, control;
 	acpi_status status;
 	struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
@@ -372,29 +372,29 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
 	 * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
 	 */
-	flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
-	acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
+	support = base_support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
+	acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
 
 	if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
-		flags |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
+		support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
 	if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
-		flags |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
+		support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
 	}
 	if (pci_msi_enabled())
-		flags |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
-	if (flags != base_flags) {
-		status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
+		support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
+	if (support != base_support) {
+		status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 			dev_info(&device->dev, "ACPI _OSC support "
 				"notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM\n");
 			*no_aspm = 1;
-			flags = base_flags;
+			support = base_support;
 		}
 	}
 
 	if (!pcie_ports_disabled
-	    && (flags & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
-		flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
+	    && (support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+		control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
 			| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
 			| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
 
@@ -403,17 +403,18 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 				dev_dbg(&device->dev,
 					"PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
 			else
-				flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+				control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
 		}
 
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
-			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
+			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
 
-		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
+		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
 				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
 		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 			dev_info(&device->dev,
-				"ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n", flags);
+				"ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
+				control);
 			if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
 				/*
 				 * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 			dev_info(&device->dev,
 				"ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
 				"returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
-				acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
+				acpi_format_exception(status), control);
 			dev_info(&device->dev,
 				 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
 			/*
@@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 	} else {
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
 			 "Unable to request _OSC control "
-			 "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
+			 "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", support);
 	}
 }
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-06 17:13 [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: Write _OSC bit field definitions in hex Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc() declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/14] ACPI: Remove unused OSC_PCI_NATIVE_HOTPLUG Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] ACPI: Write OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS like OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] PCI/ACPI: Name _OSC #defines more consistently Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] PCI/ACPI: Drop unnecessary _OSC existence tests Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC stuff from acpi_pci_root_add() to negotiate_os_control() Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/14] PCI/ACPI: Run _OSC only once for OSPM feature support Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/14] PCI/ACPI: Skip _OSC control tests if _OSC support call failed Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "PCIe port services disabled" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 13/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "we don't support enough services" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] PCI/ACPI: Decode _OSC bitmasks symbolically Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07  0:01 ` [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-07 13:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 22:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-25  6:52     ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-07  0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130906171436.11482.21353.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox