From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] PCI/ACPI: Split _OSC "support" and "control" flags into separate variables
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:14:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906171436.11482.21353.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906171010.11482.34235.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop>
Previously we used "flags" for both:
- the bitmask of features we support (segments, ASPM, MSI, etc.), and
- the bitmask of features we want to control (native hotplug, AER, etc.)
To reduce confusion, this patch splits this into two variables:
"support" is the bitmask of features we support, and "control" is the
bitmask of features we want to control. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 3e57f10..3e06d4e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
int *clear_aspm)
{
- u32 flags, base_flags;
+ u32 support, base_support, control;
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
@@ -372,29 +372,29 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
* All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
* PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
*/
- flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
- acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
+ support = base_support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
+ acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
- flags |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
+ support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
- flags |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
+ support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
}
if (pci_msi_enabled())
- flags |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
- if (flags != base_flags) {
- status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
+ support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
+ if (support != base_support) {
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
dev_info(&device->dev, "ACPI _OSC support "
"notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM\n");
*no_aspm = 1;
- flags = base_flags;
+ support = base_support;
}
}
if (!pcie_ports_disabled
- && (flags & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
- flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
+ && (support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+ control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
@@ -403,17 +403,18 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
dev_dbg(&device->dev,
"PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
else
- flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
}
dev_info(&device->dev,
- "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
+ "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
- status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n", flags);
+ "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
+ control);
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
/*
* We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
dev_info(&device->dev,
"ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
"returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
+ acpi_format_exception(status), control);
dev_info(&device->dev,
"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
/*
@@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
} else {
dev_info(&device->dev,
"Unable to request _OSC control "
- "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
+ "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", support);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-06 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 17:13 [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: Write _OSC bit field definitions in hex Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc() declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/14] ACPI: Remove unused OSC_PCI_NATIVE_HOTPLUG Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] ACPI: Write OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS like OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] PCI/ACPI: Name _OSC #defines more consistently Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] PCI/ACPI: Drop unnecessary _OSC existence tests Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC stuff from acpi_pci_root_add() to negotiate_os_control() Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/14] PCI/ACPI: Run _OSC only once for OSPM feature support Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/14] PCI/ACPI: Skip _OSC control tests if _OSC support call failed Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "PCIe port services disabled" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 13/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "we don't support enough services" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] PCI/ACPI: Decode _OSC bitmasks symbolically Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 0:01 ` [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-07 13:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-25 6:52 ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-07 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130906171436.11482.21353.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox