From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "we don't support enough services" path
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:15:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906171506.11482.80881.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906171010.11482.34235.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop>
Test the services we support (extended config space, ASPM, MSI) separately
so we can give a better message. Previously we said "Unable to request
_OSC control..."; now we'll say "we support %#02x but %#02x are required".
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 68e5a18..65aefcf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -392,55 +392,55 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
return;
}
- if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
- control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
- | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
- | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
-
- if (pci_aer_available()) {
- if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
- dev_dbg(&device->dev,
- "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
- else
- control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
- }
+ if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+ dev_info(&device->dev, "Not requesting _OSC control (we support %#02x but %#02x are required)\n",
+ support, ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
+ | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
+ | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
+
+ if (pci_aer_available()) {
+ if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
+ dev_dbg(&device->dev,
+ "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
+ else
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+ }
+ dev_info(&device->dev,
+ "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
+
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
+ OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
dev_info(&device->dev,
- "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
-
- status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
- OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
- control);
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
- /*
- * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
- * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
- */
- *clear_aspm = 1;
- }
- } else {
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
- "returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status), control);
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
+ "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
+ control);
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
/*
- * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
- * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
- * properly handle PCIe 1.1 devices. So we set this
- * flag here, to defer the action until after the ACPI
- * root scan.
+ * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
+ * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
*/
- *no_aspm = 1;
+ *clear_aspm = 1;
}
} else {
dev_info(&device->dev,
- "Unable to request _OSC control "
- "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", support);
+ "ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
+ "returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
+ acpi_format_exception(status), control);
+ dev_info(&device->dev,
+ "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
+ /*
+ * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
+ * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
+ * properly handle PCIe 1.1 devices. So we set this
+ * flag here, to defer the action until after the ACPI
+ * root scan.
+ */
+ *no_aspm = 1;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-06 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 17:13 [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: Write _OSC bit field definitions in hex Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc() declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/14] ACPI: Remove unused OSC_PCI_NATIVE_HOTPLUG Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] ACPI: Write OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS like OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] PCI/ACPI: Name _OSC #defines more consistently Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] PCI/ACPI: Drop unnecessary _OSC existence tests Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC stuff from acpi_pci_root_add() to negotiate_os_control() Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 09/14] PCI/ACPI: Split _OSC "support" and "control" flags into separate variables Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/14] PCI/ACPI: Run _OSC only once for OSPM feature support Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/14] PCI/ACPI: Skip _OSC control tests if _OSC support call failed Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "PCIe port services disabled" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] PCI/ACPI: Decode _OSC bitmasks symbolically Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 0:01 ` [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-07 13:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-25 6:52 ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-07 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130906171506.11482.80881.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox