Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "we don't support enough services" path
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:15:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906171506.11482.80881.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906171010.11482.34235.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop>

Test the services we support (extended config space, ASPM, MSI) separately
so we can give a better message.  Previously we said "Unable to request
_OSC control..."; now we'll say "we support %#02x but %#02x are required".

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 68e5a18..65aefcf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -392,55 +392,55 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
-		control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
-			| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
-			| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
-
-		if (pci_aer_available()) {
-			if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
-				dev_dbg(&device->dev,
-					"PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
-			else
-				control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
-		}
+	if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+		dev_info(&device->dev, "Not requesting _OSC control (we support %#02x but %#02x are required)\n",
+			 support, ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
+		| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
+		| OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
+
+	if (pci_aer_available()) {
+		if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
+			dev_dbg(&device->dev,
+				"PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
+		else
+			control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+	}
 
+	dev_info(&device->dev,
+		 "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
+
+	status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
+					  OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
-			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", control);
-
-		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
-				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
-		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
-			dev_info(&device->dev,
-				"ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
-				control);
-			if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
-				/*
-				 * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
-				 * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
-				 */
-				*clear_aspm = 1;
-			}
-		} else {
-			dev_info(&device->dev,
-				"ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
-				"returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
-				acpi_format_exception(status), control);
-			dev_info(&device->dev,
-				 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
+			 "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n",
+			 control);
+		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
 			/*
-			 * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
-			 * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
-			 * properly handle PCIe 1.1 devices.  So we set this
-			 * flag here, to defer the action until after the ACPI
-			 * root scan.
+			 * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
+			 * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
 			 */
-			*no_aspm = 1;
+			*clear_aspm = 1;
 		}
 	} else {
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
-			 "Unable to request _OSC control "
-			 "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", support);
+			"ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
+			"returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
+			acpi_format_exception(status), control);
+		dev_info(&device->dev,
+			 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
+		/*
+		 * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
+		 * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
+		 * properly handle PCIe 1.1 devices.  So we set this
+		 * flag here, to defer the action until after the ACPI
+		 * root scan.
+		 */
+		*no_aspm = 1;
 	}
 }
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-06 17:13 [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: Write _OSC bit field definitions in hex Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc() declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/14] ACPI: Remove unused OSC_PCI_NATIVE_HOTPLUG Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] ACPI: Write OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS like OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] PCI/ACPI: Name _OSC #defines more consistently Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] PCI/ACPI: Drop unnecessary _OSC existence tests Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC stuff from acpi_pci_root_add() to negotiate_os_control() Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 09/14] PCI/ACPI: Split _OSC "support" and "control" flags into separate variables Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/14] PCI/ACPI: Run _OSC only once for OSPM feature support Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/14] PCI/ACPI: Skip _OSC control tests if _OSC support call failed Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/14] PCI/ACPI: Separate out _OSC "PCIe port services disabled" path Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-06 17:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-09-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] PCI/ACPI: Decode _OSC bitmasks symbolically Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07  0:01 ` [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-07 13:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-07 22:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-25  6:52     ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-07  0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130906171506.11482.80881.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox