Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/portdrv: Use link bandwidth notification capability bit
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:56:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210716215647.GA2146665@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512213314.7778-1-stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:03:14AM +0530, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> The pcieport driver can fail to attach to a downstream port that doesn't
> support bandwidth notification.  This can happen when, in
> pcie_port_device_register(), pci_init_service_irqs() tries (and fails) to
> set up a bandwidth notification IRQ for a device that doesn't support it.

I'm trying to figure out exactly how this fails.  The only failure
path in pcie_init_service_irqs() is when
pci_alloc_irq_vectors(PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) fails, which I guess means the
port's dev->irq was zero?

And to even attempt legacy IRQs, either we had pcie_pme_no_msi() or
pcie_port_enable_irq_vec() failed?

> This patch changes get_port_device_capability() to look at the link
> bandwidth notification capability bit in the link capabilities register of
> the port, instead of assuming that all downstream ports have that
> capability.

I think this needs:

  Fixes: e8303bb7a75c ("PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification")

because even though b4c7d2076b4e ("PCI/LINK: Remove bandwidth
notification") removed *most* of e8303bb7a75c, it did not remove the
code in get_port_device_capability() that you're fixing here.

I can fix this up locally, no need to resend.  I think the patch
itself is fine, just trying to understand the commit log.

> Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> ---
> 
> changes from v1:
> 	- corrected spelling errors in commit message
> 	- added Lukas' reviewed-by:
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index e1fed6649c41..3ee63968deaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -257,8 +257,13 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC;
>  
>  	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
> -	    pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> -		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_BWNOTIF;
> +	    pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
> +		u32 linkcap;
> +
> +		pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &linkcap);
> +		if (linkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_LBNC)
> +			services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_BWNOTIF;
> +	}
>  
>  	return services;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12 21:33 [PATCH v2] PCI/portdrv: Use link bandwidth notification capability bit Stuart Hayes
2021-05-14 13:03 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-05-14 13:08   ` Lukas Wunner
2021-05-14 13:17     ` Krzysztof Wilczy??ski
2021-05-27  1:12       ` stuart hayes
2021-07-07 15:48         ` stuart hayes
2021-07-07 18:59           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-31 19:20         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-31 21:39           ` stuart hayes
2021-08-31 21:58             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-01  5:48               ` Lukas Wunner
2021-09-01 21:28                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-16 21:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-07-17  2:43   ` stuart hayes
2021-08-31 19:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210716215647.GA2146665@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox