From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, pali@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH pci-fixes 2/2] Revert "PCI: aardvark: Fix support for PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 on emulated bridge"
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:29:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211130112937.GA3130@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125160148.26029-3-kabel@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:01:48PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> This reverts commit 239edf686c14a9ff926dec2f350289ed7adfefe2.
>
> PCI Bridge which represents aardvark's PCIe Root Port has Expansion ROM
> Base Address register at offset 0x30, but its meaning is different than
> PCI's Expansion ROM BAR register, although the layout is the same.
> (This is why we thought it does the same thing.)
>
> First: there is no ROM (or part of BootROM) in the A3720 SOC dedicated
> for PCIe Root Port (or controller in RC mode) containing executable code
> that would initialize the Root Port, suitable for execution in
> bootloader (this is how Expansion ROM BAR is used on x86).
>
> Second: in A3720 spec the register (address D0070030) is not documented
> at all for Root Complex mode, but similar to other BAR registers, it has
> an "entangled partner" in register D0075920, which does address
> translation for the BAR in D0070030:
> - the BAR register sets the address from the view of PCIe bus
> - the translation register sets the address from the view of the CPU
>
> The other BAR registers also have this entangled partner, and they
> can be used to:
> - in RC mode: address-checking on the receive side of the RC (they
> can define address ranges for memory accesses from remote Endpoints
> to the RC)
> - in Endpoint mode: allow the remote CPU to access memory on A3720
>
> The Expansion ROM BAR has only the Endpoint part documented, but from
> the similarities we think that it can also be used in RC mode in that
> way.
>
> So either Expansion ROM BAR has different meaning (if the hypothesis
> above is true), or we don't know it's meaning (since it is not
> documented for RC mode).
>
> Remove the register from the emulated bridge accessing functions.
>
> Fixes: 239edf686c14 ("PCI: aardvark: Fix support for PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 on emulated bridge")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
Bjorn,
this reverts a commit we merged the last merge window so it is
a candidate for one of the upcoming -rcX.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> index baa62cdcaab4..e3001b3b3293 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
> #define PCIE_CORE_DEV_ID_REG 0x0
> #define PCIE_CORE_CMD_STATUS_REG 0x4
> #define PCIE_CORE_DEV_REV_REG 0x8
> -#define PCIE_CORE_EXP_ROM_BAR_REG 0x30
> #define PCIE_CORE_PCIEXP_CAP 0xc0
> #define PCIE_CORE_ERR_CAPCTL_REG 0x118
> #define PCIE_CORE_ERR_CAPCTL_ECRC_CHK_TX BIT(5)
> @@ -774,10 +773,6 @@ advk_pci_bridge_emul_base_conf_read(struct pci_bridge_emul *bridge,
> *value = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_CMD_STATUS_REG);
> return PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL_HANDLED;
>
> - case PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1:
> - *value = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_EXP_ROM_BAR_REG);
> - return PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL_HANDLED;
> -
> case PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE: {
> /*
> * From the whole 32bit register we support reading from HW only
> @@ -810,10 +805,6 @@ advk_pci_bridge_emul_base_conf_write(struct pci_bridge_emul *bridge,
> advk_writel(pcie, new, PCIE_CORE_CMD_STATUS_REG);
> break;
>
> - case PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1:
> - advk_writel(pcie, new, PCIE_CORE_EXP_ROM_BAR_REG);
> - break;
> -
> case PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE:
> if (mask & (PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET << 16)) {
> u32 val = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_CTRL1_REG);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 16:01 [PATCH pci-fixes 0/2] PCI Aardvark controller fixes Marek Behún
2021-11-25 16:01 ` [PATCH pci-fixes 1/2] PCI: aardvark: Fix checking for MEM resource type Marek Behún
2021-11-25 16:01 ` [PATCH pci-fixes 2/2] Revert "PCI: aardvark: Fix support for PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 on emulated bridge" Marek Behún
2021-11-30 11:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2021-12-01 1:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 9:50 ` Marek Behún
2021-12-01 12:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 17:23 ` Marek Behún
2021-12-01 18:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-30 11:43 ` Pali Rohár
2021-12-02 16:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-06 10:18 ` (subset) [PATCH pci-fixes 0/2] PCI Aardvark controller fixes Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211130112937.GA3130@lpieralisi \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox