Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] hisi_acc_qm: Move PCI device IDs to common header

[Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:12:59 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:33:38AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > [Cc+ Bjorn, linux-pci]
> > 
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:01:14 +0000
> > Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Move the PCI Device IDs of HiSilicon ACC devices to
> > > a common header and use a uniform naming convention.  
> 
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > @@ -2529,6 +2529,12 @@
> > >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_KORENIX_JETCARDF3	0x17ff
> > >  
> > >  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI		0x19e5
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_PF	0xa250
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_VF	0xa251
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_PF	0xa255
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_VF	0xa256
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_PF	0xa258
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_VF	0xa259  
> 
> We usually don't add things to pci_ids.h unless they're used in more
> than one place (see the comment at the top of the file).  AFAICT,
> these device IDs are only used in one file, so you can leave the
> #defines in the file that uses them or use bare hex values.

Later in this series the VF IDs are added to a vendor variant of the
vfio-pci driver:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220228090121.1903-5-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com/

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8129c3457b3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
...
+static const struct pci_device_id hisi_acc_vfio_pci_table[] = {
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_VF) },
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_VF) },
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_VF) },
+	{ }
+};

So I think the VFs IDs meet the requirements, but perhaps not the PF
IDs.  Would it be ok if the PFs were dropped?  Thanks,

Alex