From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
oohall@gmail.com, Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Sheng Bi <windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com>,
Ravi Kishore Koppuravuri <ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
Yang Su <yang.su@linux.alibaba.com>,
shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Bail out early in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() if link is not trained
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:42:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414074238.GA22973@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413101642.8724-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:16:42PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -5037,6 +5037,22 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Everything above is handling the delays mandated by the PCIe r6.0
> + * sec 6.6.1.
> + *
> + * If the port supports active link reporting we now check one more
> + * time if the link is active and if not bail out early with the
> + * assumption that the device is not present anymore.
> + */
> + if (dev->link_active_reporting) {
> + u16 status;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &status);
> + if (!(status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA))
> + return -ENOTTY;
> + }
> +
> return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
> PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS - delay);
> }
Hm, shouldn't the added code live in the
if (pcie_get_speed_cap(dev) <= PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT)
branch? For the else branch (Gen3+ devices with > 5 GT/s),
we've already waited for the link to become active, so the
additional check seems superfluous. (But maybe I'm missing
something.)
I also note that this documentation change has been dropped
vis-à-vis v1 of the patch, not sure if that's intentional:
- * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the
- * software must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the
- * device that did not respond is a broken device. There is
- * evidence that 100 ms is not always enough, for example certain
- * Titan Ridge xHCI controller does not always respond to
- * configuration requests if we only wait for 100 ms (see
- * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203885).
+ * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the software
+ * must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the device that
+ * did not respond is a broken device. Also device can take longer than
+ * that to respond if it indicates so through Request Retry Status
+ * completions.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 10:16 [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Bail out early in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() if link is not trained Mika Westerberg
2023-04-13 14:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-14 7:42 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-04-14 10:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-04-16 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-04-17 6:07 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414074238.GA22973@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
--cc=windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.su@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox