public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	oohall@gmail.com, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>,
	Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Sheng Bi <windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com>,
	Ravi Kishore Koppuravuri <ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
	Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
	Yang Su <yang.su@linux.alibaba.com>,
	shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] PCI/PM: Shorten pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() wait time for slow links
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:47:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425064751.24951-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)

With slow links (<= 5GT/s) active link reporting is not mandatory, so if
a device is disconnected during system sleep we might end up waiting for
it to respond for ~60s slowing down resume time. PCIe spec r6.0 sec
6.6.1 mandates that the system software must wait for at least 1s before
it can determine the device as broken device so use the minimum
requirement for slow links and bail out if we do not get reply within
1s. However, if the port supports active link reporting we can continue
the wait following what we do with the fast links.

This should make system resume time faster for slow links as well while
still following the PCIe spec.

While there move the PCI_RESET_WAIT constant into pci.c because it is
not used outside of that file anymore.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi all,

The previous version of the patch can be found here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20230418072808.10431-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com/

Changes from the previous version:

  * Observe the mandatory 1s delay before looking at the active link
    reporting as suggesteed by Lukas.

 drivers/pci/pci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/pci/pci.h |  7 -------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 0b4f3b08f780..6bc0eeeb37fa 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ struct pci_pme_device {
 
 #define PME_TIMEOUT 1000 /* How long between PME checks */
 
+/*
+ * Following exit from Conventional Reset, devices must be ready within 1 sec
+ * (PCIe r6.0 sec 6.6.1).  A D3cold to D0 transition implies a Conventional
+ * Reset (PCIe r6.0 sec 5.8).
+ */
+#define PCI_RESET_WAIT 1000 /* msec */
+
 /*
  * Devices may extend the 1 sec period through Request Retry Status
  * completions (PCIe r6.0 sec 2.3.1).  The spec does not provide an upper
@@ -5012,11 +5019,9 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
 	 *
 	 * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the
 	 * software must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the
-	 * device that did not respond is a broken device. There is
-	 * evidence that 100 ms is not always enough, for example certain
-	 * Titan Ridge xHCI controller does not always respond to
-	 * configuration requests if we only wait for 100 ms (see
-	 * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203885).
+	 * device that did not respond is a broken device. Also device can
+	 * take longer than that to respond if it indicates so through Request
+	 * Retry Status completions.
 	 *
 	 * Therefore we wait for 100 ms and check for the device presence
 	 * until the timeout expires.
@@ -5025,16 +5030,36 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (pcie_get_speed_cap(dev) <= PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT) {
+		u16 status;
+
 		pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link\n", delay);
 		msleep(delay);
-	} else {
-		pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link, after activation\n",
-			delay);
-		if (!pcie_wait_for_link_delay(dev, true, delay)) {
-			/* Did not train, no need to wait any further */
-			pci_info(dev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
+
+		if (!pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type, PCI_RESET_WAIT - delay))
+			return 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * If the port supports active link reporting we now check
+		 * whether the link is active and if not bail out early with
+		 * the assumption that the device is not present anymore.
+		 */
+		if (!dev->link_active_reporting)
 			return -ENOTTY;
-		}
+
+		pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &status);
+		if (!(status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA))
+			return -ENOTTY;
+
+		return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
+				    PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS - PCI_RESET_WAIT);
+	}
+
+	pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link, after activation\n",
+		delay);
+	if (!pcie_wait_for_link_delay(dev, true, delay)) {
+		/* Did not train, no need to wait any further */
+		pci_info(dev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
+		return -ENOTTY;
 	}
 
 	return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 67005a0ee381..42ce4c6e738f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -64,13 +64,6 @@ struct pci_cap_saved_state *pci_find_saved_ext_cap(struct pci_dev *dev,
 #define PCI_PM_D3HOT_WAIT       10	/* msec */
 #define PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT      100	/* msec */
 
-/*
- * Following exit from Conventional Reset, devices must be ready within 1 sec
- * (PCIe r6.0 sec 6.6.1).  A D3cold to D0 transition implies a Conventional
- * Reset (PCIe r6.0 sec 5.8).
- */
-#define PCI_RESET_WAIT		1000	/* msec */
-
 void pci_update_current_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
 void pci_refresh_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
 int pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev);
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-25  6:47 Mika Westerberg [this message]
2023-04-25 10:30 ` [PATCH v5] PCI/PM: Shorten pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() wait time for slow links Lukas Wunner
2023-04-25 14:46 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-05-24 12:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-06-06  5:10   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-06-06 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230425064751.24951-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
    --cc=windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com \
    --cc=yang.su@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox