From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
oohall@gmail.com, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Sheng Bi <windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com>,
Ravi Kishore Koppuravuri <ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
Yang Su <yang.su@linux.alibaba.com>,
shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] PCI/PM: Shorten pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() wait time for slow links
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:24:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606222428.GA1147488@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425064751.24951-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:47:51AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> With slow links (<= 5GT/s) active link reporting is not mandatory, so if
> a device is disconnected during system sleep we might end up waiting for
> it to respond for ~60s slowing down resume time. PCIe spec r6.0 sec
> 6.6.1 mandates that the system software must wait for at least 1s before
> it can determine the device as broken device so use the minimum
> requirement for slow links and bail out if we do not get reply within
> 1s. However, if the port supports active link reporting we can continue
> the wait following what we do with the fast links.
>
> This should make system resume time faster for slow links as well while
> still following the PCIe spec.
>
> While there move the PCI_RESET_WAIT constant into pci.c because it is
> not used outside of that file anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Applied with acks from Lukas and Sathy to pci/pm for v6.5, thanks!
> ---
> Hi all,
>
> The previous version of the patch can be found here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20230418072808.10431-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com/
>
> Changes from the previous version:
>
> * Observe the mandatory 1s delay before looking at the active link
> reporting as suggesteed by Lukas.
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 0b4f3b08f780..6bc0eeeb37fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ struct pci_pme_device {
>
> #define PME_TIMEOUT 1000 /* How long between PME checks */
>
> +/*
> + * Following exit from Conventional Reset, devices must be ready within 1 sec
> + * (PCIe r6.0 sec 6.6.1). A D3cold to D0 transition implies a Conventional
> + * Reset (PCIe r6.0 sec 5.8).
> + */
> +#define PCI_RESET_WAIT 1000 /* msec */
> +
> /*
> * Devices may extend the 1 sec period through Request Retry Status
> * completions (PCIe r6.0 sec 2.3.1). The spec does not provide an upper
> @@ -5012,11 +5019,9 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
> *
> * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the
> * software must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the
> - * device that did not respond is a broken device. There is
> - * evidence that 100 ms is not always enough, for example certain
> - * Titan Ridge xHCI controller does not always respond to
> - * configuration requests if we only wait for 100 ms (see
> - * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203885).
> + * device that did not respond is a broken device. Also device can
> + * take longer than that to respond if it indicates so through Request
> + * Retry Status completions.
> *
> * Therefore we wait for 100 ms and check for the device presence
> * until the timeout expires.
> @@ -5025,16 +5030,36 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
> return 0;
>
> if (pcie_get_speed_cap(dev) <= PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT) {
> + u16 status;
> +
> pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link\n", delay);
> msleep(delay);
> - } else {
> - pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link, after activation\n",
> - delay);
> - if (!pcie_wait_for_link_delay(dev, true, delay)) {
> - /* Did not train, no need to wait any further */
> - pci_info(dev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
> +
> + if (!pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type, PCI_RESET_WAIT - delay))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the port supports active link reporting we now check
> + * whether the link is active and if not bail out early with
> + * the assumption that the device is not present anymore.
> + */
> + if (!dev->link_active_reporting)
> return -ENOTTY;
> - }
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &status);
> + if (!(status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA))
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +
> + return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
> + PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS - PCI_RESET_WAIT);
> + }
> +
> + pci_dbg(dev, "waiting %d ms for downstream link, after activation\n",
> + delay);
> + if (!pcie_wait_for_link_delay(dev, true, delay)) {
> + /* Did not train, no need to wait any further */
> + pci_info(dev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
> + return -ENOTTY;
> }
>
> return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 67005a0ee381..42ce4c6e738f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -64,13 +64,6 @@ struct pci_cap_saved_state *pci_find_saved_ext_cap(struct pci_dev *dev,
> #define PCI_PM_D3HOT_WAIT 10 /* msec */
> #define PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT 100 /* msec */
>
> -/*
> - * Following exit from Conventional Reset, devices must be ready within 1 sec
> - * (PCIe r6.0 sec 6.6.1). A D3cold to D0 transition implies a Conventional
> - * Reset (PCIe r6.0 sec 5.8).
> - */
> -#define PCI_RESET_WAIT 1000 /* msec */
> -
> void pci_update_current_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
> void pci_refresh_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 6:47 [PATCH v5] PCI/PM: Shorten pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() wait time for slow links Mika Westerberg
2023-04-25 10:30 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-04-25 14:46 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-05-24 12:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-06-06 5:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-06-06 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230606222428.GA1147488@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
--cc=windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.su@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox