From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert()
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:28:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240813202837.GE1922056@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729122245.33410-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Hello,
> Currently, the endpoint cleanup function dw_pcie_ep_cleanup() and EPF
> deinit notify function pci_epc_deinit_notify() are called during the
> execution of qcom_pcie_perst_assert() i.e., when the host has asserted
> PERST#. But quickly after this step, refclk will also be disabled by the
> host.
>
> All of the Qcom endpoint SoCs supported as of now depend on the refclk from
> the host for keeping the controller operational. Due to this limitation,
> any access to the hardware registers in the absence of refclk will result
> in a whole endpoint crash. Unfortunately, most of the controller cleanups
> require accessing the hardware registers (like eDMA cleanup performed in
> dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(), powering down MHI EPF etc...). So these cleanup
> functions are currently causing the crash in the endpoint SoC once host
> asserts PERST#.
>
> One way to address this issue is by generating the refclk in the endpoint
> itself and not depending on the host. But that is not always possible as
> some of the endpoint designs do require the endpoint to consume refclk from
> the host (as I was told by the Qcom engineers).
>
> So let's fix this crash by moving the controller cleanups to the start of
> the qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() function. qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() is
> called whenever the host has deasserted PERST# and it is guaranteed that
> the refclk would be active at this point. So at the start of this function,
> the controller cleanup can be performed. Once finished, rest of the code
> execution for PERST# deassert can continue as usual.
Applied to controller/qcom, thank you!
[1/1] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert()
https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/6960cdc1ef97
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 12:22 [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-29 12:28 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-07-29 13:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-31 4:31 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-08-13 20:28 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2024-08-21 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-01 16:35 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-15 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-16 5:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-16 19:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-17 2:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240813202837.GE1922056@rocinante \
--to=kw@linux.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox