From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:01:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea5e7343-af67-ceeb-3448-5fd7dee495e3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729135547.GA35559@thinkpad>
On 7/29/2024 7:25 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 05:58:31PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/29/2024 5:52 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Currently, the endpoint cleanup function dw_pcie_ep_cleanup() and EPF
>>> deinit notify function pci_epc_deinit_notify() are called during the
>>> execution of qcom_pcie_perst_assert() i.e., when the host has asserted
>>> PERST#. But quickly after this step, refclk will also be disabled by the
>>> host.
>>>
>>> All of the Qcom endpoint SoCs supported as of now depend on the refclk from
>>> the host for keeping the controller operational. Due to this limitation,
>>> any access to the hardware registers in the absence of refclk will result
>>> in a whole endpoint crash. Unfortunately, most of the controller cleanups
>>> require accessing the hardware registers (like eDMA cleanup performed in
>>> dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(), powering down MHI EPF etc...). So these cleanup
>>> functions are currently causing the crash in the endpoint SoC once host
>>> asserts PERST#.
>>>
>>> One way to address this issue is by generating the refclk in the endpoint
>>> itself and not depending on the host. But that is not always possible as
>>> some of the endpoint designs do require the endpoint to consume refclk from
>>> the host (as I was told by the Qcom engineers).
>>>
>>> So let's fix this crash by moving the controller cleanups to the start of
>>> the qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() function. qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() is
>>> called whenever the host has deasserted PERST# and it is guaranteed that
>>> the refclk would be active at this point. So at the start of this function,
>>> the controller cleanup can be performed. Once finished, rest of the code
>>> execution for PERST# deassert can continue as usual.
>>>
>> How about doing the cleanup as part of pme turnoff message.
>> As host waits for L23 ready from the device side. we can use that time
>> to cleanup the host before sending L23 ready.
>>
>
> Yes, but that's only applicable if the host properly powers down the device. But
> it won't work in the case of host crash or host abrupt poweroff.
>
> - Mani
>
Ack.
- Krishna Chaitanya.
>> - Krishna Chaitanya.
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> index 2319ff2ae9f6..e024b4dcd76d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ep_cfg {
>>> * @link_status: PCIe Link status
>>> * @global_irq: Qualcomm PCIe specific Global IRQ
>>> * @perst_irq: PERST# IRQ
>>> + * @cleanup_pending: Cleanup is pending for the controller (because refclk is
>>> + * needed for cleanup)
>>> */
>>> struct qcom_pcie_ep {
>>> struct dw_pcie pci;
>>> @@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ep {
>>> enum qcom_pcie_ep_link_status link_status;
>>> int global_irq;
>>> int perst_irq;
>>> + bool cleanup_pending;
>>> };
>>> static int qcom_pcie_ep_core_reset(struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep)
>>> @@ -389,6 +392,12 @@ static int qcom_pcie_perst_deassert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> + if (pcie_ep->cleanup_pending) {
>>> + pci_epc_deinit_notify(pci->ep.epc);
>>> + dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(&pci->ep);
>>> + pcie_ep->cleanup_pending = false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> /* Assert WAKE# to RC to indicate device is ready */
>>> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pcie_ep->wake, 1);
>>> usleep_range(WAKE_DELAY_US, WAKE_DELAY_US + 500);
>>> @@ -522,10 +531,9 @@ static void qcom_pcie_perst_assert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>> {
>>> struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep = to_pcie_ep(pci);
>>> - pci_epc_deinit_notify(pci->ep.epc);
>>> - dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(&pci->ep);
>>> qcom_pcie_disable_resources(pcie_ep);
>>> pcie_ep->link_status = QCOM_PCIE_EP_LINK_DISABLED;
>>> + pcie_ep->cleanup_pending = true;
>>> }
>>> /* Common DWC controller ops */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 12:22 [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-29 12:28 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-07-29 13:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-31 4:31 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru [this message]
2024-08-13 20:28 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-21 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-01 16:35 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-15 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-16 5:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-16 19:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-17 2:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea5e7343-af67-ceeb-3448-5fd7dee495e3@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox