Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
Cc: <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>, <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
	<lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI: kirin: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:11:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828131117.00004d1b@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828073825.43072-2-zhangzekun11@huawei.com>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:38:21 +0800
Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com> wrote:

> for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() provides a scope-based cleanup
> functinality to put the device_node automatically, and we don't need to
> call of_node_put() directly.  Let's simplify the code a bit with the use
> of these functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
Hi.

Looks good.  A passing comment on another ugly bit of code in his
function that you could tidy up whilst here.

For what you have covered
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> index 0a29136491b8..e9bda1746ca5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static long kirin_pcie_get_resource(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,
>  				    struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	struct device_node *child, *node = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>  	void __iomem *apb_base;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -477,17 +477,13 @@ static long kirin_pcie_get_resource(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,
>  		return ret;
>  
Looking at this function I don't suppose you fancy also tidying up the oddity of:
	kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node,
							  "reset-gpios", 0);
	if (kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
	} else if (!gpio_is_valid(kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst)) {
		dev_err(dev, "unable to get a valid gpio pin\n");
		return -ENODEV;
	}

Where that else adds nothing and it could just be
	ret = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node, "reset-gpios", 0);
	if (ret < 0)
		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
				     "unable to get a valid gpio pin\n2);

	kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst = ret;

or even update the gpio handling in general to use non deprecated
functions.

>  	/* Parse OF children */
> -	for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(node, child) {
>  		ret = kirin_pcie_parse_port(kirin_pcie, pdev, child);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto put_node;
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -
> -put_node:
> -	of_node_put(child);
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void kirin_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28  7:38 [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code with _scoped() helper functions Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28  7:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI: kirin: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:11   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-29  1:20     ` zhangzekun (A)
2024-08-28  7:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI: mediatek: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  7:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: mt7621: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28  9:18   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2024-08-28 12:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  7:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: apple: Use helper function for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  7:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: tegra: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:21   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240828131117.00004d1b@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
    --cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangzekun11@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox