From: "zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>, <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
<lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
<maz@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI: kirin: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:20:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37c7dc6f-f994-4620-a9af-6c90eba7ebdf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828131117.00004d1b@Huawei.com>
在 2024/8/28 20:11, Jonathan Cameron 写道:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:38:21 +0800
> Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() provides a scope-based cleanup
>> functinality to put the device_node automatically, and we don't need to
>> call of_node_put() directly. Let's simplify the code a bit with the use
>> of these functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
> Hi.
>
> Looks good. A passing comment on another ugly bit of code in his
> function that you could tidy up whilst here.
>
> For what you have covered
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 10 +++-------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> index 0a29136491b8..e9bda1746ca5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static long kirin_pcie_get_resource(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,
>> struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - struct device_node *child, *node = dev->of_node;
>> + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>> void __iomem *apb_base;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -477,17 +477,13 @@ static long kirin_pcie_get_resource(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie,
>> return ret;
>>
> Looking at this function I don't suppose you fancy also tidying up the oddity of:
> kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node,
> "reset-gpios", 0);
> if (kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> } else if (!gpio_is_valid(kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst)) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to get a valid gpio pin\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> Where that else adds nothing and it could just be
> ret = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node, "reset-gpios", 0);
> if (ret < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "unable to get a valid gpio pin\n2);
>
> kirin_pcie->gpio_id_dwc_perst = ret;
>
> or even update the gpio handling in general to use non deprecated
> functions.
>
Hi, Jonathan,
Thanks for your review. I will send v2 to tidy up together.
Beset Regards,
Zekun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 7:38 [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code with _scoped() helper functions Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI: kirin: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-29 1:20 ` zhangzekun (A) [this message]
2024-08-28 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI: mediatek: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: mt7621: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 9:18 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2024-08-28 12:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 7:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: apple: Use helper function for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 7:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: tegra: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-28 12:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37c7dc6f-f994-4620-a9af-6c90eba7ebdf@huawei.com \
--to=zhangzekun11@huawei.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox