From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>,
Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [pci:controller/dw-rockchip 2/3] drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c:227:9: error: 'PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS' undeclared; did you mean 'PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MSG'?
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:04:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250530220433.GA239797@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202505310520.ElO2YbM3-lkp@intel.com>
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 05:29:09AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> FYI, the error/warning was bisected to this commit, please ignore it if it's irrelevant.
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git controller/dw-rockchip
> head: a47c73d6a884edf2a8b09015596744a495c6a236
> commit: 56825f5946a0da29658fa8e768c8706dffdac82b [2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Replace PERST# sleep time with proper macro
> config: arm-randconfig-003-20250531 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250531/202505310520.ElO2YbM3-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250531/202505310520.ElO2YbM3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505310520.ElO2YbM3-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c: In function 'rockchip_pcie_start_link':
> >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c:227:9: error: 'PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MSG'?
> msleep(PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MSG
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c:227:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>
My fault, I added
#include "../../pci.h"
which was previously added by "PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus
before endpoint devices are ready" patch, which I dropped while we
figure out where to put the delay.
> vim +227 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>
> 208
> 209 static int rockchip_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> 210 {
> 211 struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> 212
> 213 /* Reset device */
> 214 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 0);
> 215
> 216 rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(rockchip);
> 217
> 218 /*
> 219 * PCIe requires the refclk to be stable for 100µs prior to releasing
> 220 * PERST. See table 2-4 in section 2.6.2 AC Specifications of the PCI
> 221 * Express Card Electromechanical Specification, 1.1. However, we don't
> 222 * know if the refclk is coming from RC's PHY or external OSC. If it's
> 223 * from RC, so enabling LTSSM is the just right place to release #PERST.
> 224 * We need more extra time as before, rather than setting just
> 225 * 100us as we don't know how long should the device need to reset.
> 226 */
> > 227 msleep(PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS);
> 228 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 1);
> 229
> 230 return 0;
> 231 }
> 232
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 21:29 [pci:controller/dw-rockchip 2/3] drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c:227:9: error: 'PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS' undeclared; did you mean 'PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MSG'? kernel test robot
2025-05-30 22:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250530220433.GA239797@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox